Quantcast
Channel: Central Govt Employees News – 8th Pay Commission – Staff News
Viewing all 11682 articles
Browse latest View live

Admissibility of Deputation (Duty) Allowance while on deputation: DoPT Clarification

$
0
0
Admissibility of Deputation (Duty) Allowance while on deputation: DoPT Clarification

deputation-allowance-dopt-clarification


No. 2/ 6/ 2016-Estt.(Pay-II)
Government of India
Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions
Department of Personnel and Training
North Block, New Delhi
Dated: 23rd February 2017

OFFICE MEMORANDUM

Subject: Admissibility of Deputation (Duty) Allowance while on deputation - regarding.
[post_ads]

The undersigned is directed to refer to this Department’s [O.M. of even number dated 17th February 2016 ##eye##] vide which powers were delegated to Ministries Departments / borrowing organisations to extend deputation tenures up to a period not exceeding 7 years at a stretch, in respect of cases covered by the O.M. dated 17th June 2010.

2. The matter regarding the admissibility of Deputation (Duty) Allowance in view of the change in maximum number of years of deputation tenure as provided above has been examined in this Department.

3. As per Para 8.3.2 of the OM No. 6/8/2009-Estt.(Pay~II) dated 17th June 2010, where the extension is granted up to the fifth year, the official concerned will continue to be allowed Deputation (Duty) Allowance, if he / she has opted to draw deputation (duty) allowance.

4. This Department’s [O.M. No. 2/6/2016-Estt.(Pay-II) dated 17th February 2016 ##eye##] delegates powers to Ministries / Departments / borrowing organisations, to extend deputation tenures up to a period of 7 years in a stretch, in respect of cases covered by the O.M. dated 17th June 2010. However, there has been no modification of the Para 8.3.2. of the O.M. dated 17th June 2010 by the O.M. dated 17th February 2016. The new O.M. dated 17th February 2016 provides vide Para 4 that all other terms and conditions issued vide OM No. 6 / 8 /2009-Estt.(Pay-II) dated 17th June 2010 will remain unchanged. 

5. Thus, admissibility of Deputation (Duty) Allowance would be only as per Para 8.3.2 of the O.M. dated 17th June 2010, i.e. only up to the fifth year, if the deputationist has opted to draw Deputation (Duty) Allowance.

sd/-
(A.K. Jain)
Deputy Secretary to the Government of India

[post_ads_2]

Source: [Persmin.gov.in Click here to view/download ##downlaod##]

Creation of posts and cadre review in Central Group ‘A' Civil Services: reiteration of the existing guidelines

$
0
0
Creation of posts and cadre review in Central Group ‘A' Civil Services: reiteration of the existing guidelines

F. No. I-11019/17/2016-CRD
Government of India
Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances & Pensions
Department of Personnel & Training
(Cadre Review Division)

3rd Floor, Lok Nayak Bhawan,
Khan Market, New Delhi-110 003
Dated: 15th February, 2017

Office Memorandum

Sub: Creation of posts and cadre review in Central Group ‘A' Civil Services: reiteration of the existing guidelines.

D/o Personnel and Training is the nodal agency for formulation and evaluation of personnel policies in Government of India. One of the major functions envisaged for DoPT concerns the periodical review of cadre structures of Central Group ‘A' Civil Services.

[post_ads]

2. The responsibility for laying down standards in the matter and coordination rests with this Department. The present system of cadre review of Central Group ‘A' Civil Services is in existence since 1972 with the issuance of 1st set of the Guidelines by the DoPT. The latest guidelines in this regard were issued on 14.12.2010 (Annexure-I). All the Central Group ‘A’ Services as listed by this Department have to undertake cadre review through the established procedure laid down by the DoPT which involves examination of proposal by the DoPT, DoE, Cadre Review Committee and finally approval of the Cabinet. 

3. While examining the cadre review proposals, it has come to the notice of this Department that certain cadres are not following the guidelines and periodicity of cadre review. Further, most of the cadres have adopted the ad-hoc measures of creation/up-gradation of posts or increasing the cadre strength by restructuring resulting in distortion within and amongst the Services. Most of these‘ad-hoc measures were taken without consulting the DoPT whereas, as per DoPT’s existing guidelines issued in 1978, any addition in the cadre structure has to be done in consultation with the DoPT.

4. The guidelines issued in 1978 (Annexure-II) in this regard, which were reflected in the Monographs of 1986 and 1993 also are as under:-

"Normally addition to a cadre by way of increasing the number of posts at different levels should be considered only in the course of triennial (now five years) cadre review. Mid review changes should be avoided as far as possible. Regular cadre reviews carried out at triennial (now five Years) intervals must envisage such eventualities while making advance projections for the five year period of additional manpower requirements. Accordingly, the need for creating posts not envisaged by the Cadre Review Committee before the next cadre is due can be expected to be rare. In the event, however, of such eventuality, it may be ensured that the additional posts so created conform to the cadre structure most recently approved by the Cadre Review Committee. There can, however, be no rigidity in this regard. In any case the cadre authority should consult PP Division (now Cadre Review Division) of the DP&AR ( now DoPT) in this regard.

⏵ It is pertinent to note that none the Group ‘A' Central Civil Service had been exempted from these guidelines at any point of time.

5. In order to avoid distortion in cadres, address stagnation, ensure parity between the cadres and uniformity in the applicability of the cadre review guidelines, DoPT reiterates its earlier guidelines on cadre review and all the Central Group ‘A' Civil Services (Annexure-III) are requested to undertake cadre review through the established procedure laid down by the DoPT vide its OM No. I-11011/1/2009-CRD dated 14.12.2010 (Annexure-I). Further, any addition in cadre strength of Central Group ‘A' Services must be routed through the DoPT as laid down in the cadre review guidelines issued by DoPT in 1978 as mentioned in para 4 above and reiterated in the Monographs of 1986 and 1993.

(M.S. Subramanya Rao)
Director (CRD)
[post_ads_2]

Revision of Scholarship Scheme for the Children of Non-Statutory Departmental Canteen Employees

$
0
0
Revision of Scholarship Scheme for the Children of Non-Statutory Departmental Canteen Employees out of Discretionary Fund of Director of Canteens

No.20/1/2011-Dir. (C)
Government Of India
Ministry Of Personnel, P.G.and Pensions
(Department of Personnel & Training)

Lok Nayak Bhawan, Khan Market,
New Delhi, Dated 14th February,2017

OFFICE MEMORANDUM

Subject: Revision of Scholarship Scheme for the Children of Non-Statutory Departmental Canteen Employees out of Discretionary Fund of Director of Canteens.
[post_ads]
The Scheme for grant of Scholarship for the Children of Non-Statutory Departmental Canteens, out of the funds available in the Discretionary Fund of Director of Canteens was introduced vide this Department’s O.M.No.20/1/88-Dir.(C), dated 3.12.98 and revised vide O.M.No.20.1.2011-Dir.(C), dated 2.09.2011. In suppression of this office O.M.No.20.1.2011-Dir.(C), dated 2.09.2011, the amended scheme has been introduced in consonance of Section 57 of the Aadhaar (Targeted Delivery of Financial and other Subsidiaries, Benefits and Services) Act, 2016 to encourage higher studies for canteen employees Children whose past performance had been meritorious. The details of the scholarships being instituted and the considerations which will apply are given below:

2. Scholarships

The categorical details of the scholarships are as below:-

Sl.No
Name of Scholarship/Class of studies
No. of Scholarships
Amount of each Scholarship
1 Class IX, X or Matriculation Eight (four Scholarships per class) Rs.750/-
Per Annum
2 Class XI,XII or Intermediate or PUC (for Science Stream) Four (Two Scholarships Per Class) Rs.750/-
Per Annum
3 Class XI, XII Or Intermediate or PUC (for Non-Science Stream) Four (Two Scholarships Per Class) Rs.750/-
Per Annum
4 Under Graduate Studies of three years’ duration (for Science Stream) Three (One Scholarships per class) Rs.1000/-
Per Annum
5 Under Graduate Studies of three years’ duration (for Non-Science Stream) Three (One Scholarships Rs.1000/-
Per Annum
6 Post Graduate studies of two years’ duration (for Science stream) Two (One Scholarship Per Class) Rs.1200/-
Per Annum
7 Post Graduate studies of two Years’ duration (for Non – Science Stream) Two (One Scholarship per class) Rs.1200/-
Per Annum
8 ITI Course/Diploma Courses in Engineering/Architecture One Rs.1000/-
Per Annum
9 B.E/B.Tech One Rs.2500/-
Per Annum
10 Bachelor of Architecture One Rs.2500/-
Per Annum
11 MBBS/Medical Courses One Rs.2500/-
Per Annum
12 Financial Courses One Rs.2500/-
Per Annum

[post_ads_2]

3. Awards will be given on yearly basis and every aspirant will have to meet the prescribed norms in regards to the percentage of marks in the previous year of study for being considered for grant of fresh award during the course of his/her studies. The awards will be given strictly in accordance with the principle of the highest one or next highest one (if there are more than one scholarship) getting the Scholarship.

Conditions

(a) Candidates seeking award of Scholarship should have obtained a minimum of 60% marks in the aggregate in the previous year of examination:

(b) Children belonging to SC/ST categories and Handicapped Children would be given a relaxation of 10% marks in the minimum standard. 25% of the awards for school level and Under Graduate level studies (Serials (1) to (5) of Para (2) will be earmarked for such candidates. However, being an award Scheme there will be no strict applications of general orders relating to SC/ST/Physically Handicapped. In the event of the earmarked for such candidates. However, being an award Scheme there will be no strict applications of general Orders relating to SCX/ST/Physically Handicapped. In the event of the earmarked awards remaining unutilised due to non-satisfaction of the minimum prescribed norms, the award will be transferred to the general category:

(c) One Scholarship will be reserved for girl child for class IX & X.Notwithstanding the prescribed minimum percentage the award will be given to those securing the highest marks. Only aggregate marks will be taken into account. However, every applicant should have obtained the minimum pass marks in all subjects:

(d) Children of only those Canteen Employees who are working in Central Govt. Offices/Establishments and who have been declared as Central Govt. Employees will be eligible to Apply;

(e) The Canteen employees from the Department of Telecommunications. Posts etc. Which are already having separate Scholarship Scheme are to certify that their Children are not already in receipt of Scholarship under the Schemes of their Department.

4. The Scholarship will be awarded considering the performance of the candidates in the previous years of examination. In case the studies were discontinued in the previous years(s) i.e prior to the academic year but an applicant otherwise becomes eligible for consideration, detailed justification for break in the studies during the preceding year(s) will have to be submitted. All applications will have to be submitted in the appended format only. Applications will have to be accompanied by the attested true copies of the Mark Sheets given by the recongnised Institution such as School. Central/State Boards of Education/Universities. Original certificates will be submitted, if called for, for verification.

5. The late date for receipt of applications in the office of Director (Canteens) has been extended upto 15.03.2017. It is expected that awards will be finalised by the month of March of the year. In no case any application received after the prescribed date will be entertained.

6.   (i) Individual desirous of availing benefits under the scholarship to wards of employees of Departmental Canteens are required to furnish proof of possession of possession of Aadhaar or undergo Aadhaar authentication.

      (ii)  An individual desirous of availing benefits under the said scholarship scheme who is not yet enrolled for Aadhaar is hereby required to make application for Aadhaar enrolment by 28.02/2017, in case he is entitled to obtain Aadhaar as per the provisions of Section 3 of the said Act and such individuals may visit any Aadhaar enrolment centre (list available at www.uidai.gov.in) to get enroller for Aadhaar.

Provided that till the time Aadhaar is assigned to the individual, benefits under the said scheme shall be given to the individual, subject to the production of the following documents, namely:-

(a)  (i)  Aadhaar enrolment ID, if he has enrolled, or

(ii)  A copy of request made for Aadhaar enrolment as specified in sub- paragraph (2) of Paragraph 2, and

(b)  (i) Bank Passbook with Photo or (ii) Voter’s ID Card of (iii) PAN Card or (iv) Passport; or (v) Driving Licence or (vi) Ration Card; or (vii) Photo ID Card issued by the Government.

The above documents shall be checked by an officer specifically designated by the Office of Director (Canteen) in the Department of Personnel and Training.

7. Those canteen employees who have already applied scholarship for their ward under the previous scheme,are requested to apply a fresh in revised format incorporating the requirement of documents under para 6 above.

8. Applications will be forwarded to the office of the Director (Canteens) through concerned Head of Organisation.

9. The awards of Scholarships will be decided by a duly designated Committee, as may be appointed from time to time. The decision taken by the Committee will be final and no representation in the matter will be entertained awards are finalised.

10. It is requested that wide publicity of this scheme may be given amongst all concerned.

(Sandeep Jain)
Chief Welfare Officer
Tel No. – 011 – 24625562

Revised Form - Application for award of Scholarship
revised-application-form-for-scholarship

Source: [www.dopt.gov.in Click to view/download ##download##]

7th CPC Fitment Forumla, Allowance, NPS, Pension Revision Option-I etc issues - Significance of confederation’s one day strike on 16-03-2017 – M.Krishnan

$
0
0
Significance of confederation’s one day strike on 16-03-2017 – M.Krishnan

For Circulation to all
Dated – 15.02.2017

SIGNIFICANCE OF CONFEDERATION’S ONE DAY STRIKE ON 16-03-2017

WHY NJCA SHOULD REVIVE THE DEFERRED INDEFINITE STRIKE

An article by M. Krishnan, Secretary General, Confederation

“ We had been patiently waiting for a meaningful discussion on the matter ever since then. Not only there had been any worthwhile or meaningful discussions thereafter, but no settlement was also brought about till today, though more than six months have been elapsed……. Incidentally we feel that it must be our responsibility to convey to you that the Central Government employees throughout the country are extremely critical of the fact that the Government had not found it possible to accept even a single issue taken up by the staff side JCM after the 7th Central Pay Commission submitted its recommendations to the Government”.
[post_ads]
= Excerpts from the letter written by Com. Shiv Gopal Misra, Secretary, National Council, JCM Staff Side and Convenor NJCA to Shri. Rajnath Singh, Hon’ble Home Minister on 17-01-2017.

BJP-LED NDA GOVERNMENT SHOULD REMEMBER

  • You can fool some employees and pensioners for all times. 
  • You can fool all employees and pensioners for some time.
  • But you cannot fool all employees and all pesioners for all times.
  • Employees and Pensioners are intelligent and they have the common sense to understand who is betraying them. History will not forgive those who are betraying the cause of 33 lakhs Central Govt. employees and 34 lakhs civilian pensioners.


1. GOVT.MADE IT CLEAR THAT WITHDRAWL OF NPS IS NOT WITHIN THE PURVIEW OF NPS COMMITTEE. YOUNGER GENERATION EMPLOYEES CHEATED:

Withdrawal of NPS or exemption from NPS was one of the most important demand of the NJCA in the 11th July 2016 deferred indefinite strike. In the statement issued by NJCA on 06-07-2016 after deferring the indefinite strike, it stated as follows:

“The NJCA particularly notes that the Government has set up a separate committee for reviewing the New Pension Scheme, which has been a matter of concern to all employees and workers who are recruited to Government service on or after 01-01-2004”.

It is true that Government has constituted an NPS Committee under the Chairmanship of Secretary (Pension). This created a lot of hope among the younger generation employees as they have been made to believe that the committee will consider the demand of NJCA to scrap the NPS or at least exempt Central Government employees from NPS. But to the dismay of all, in the agenda notified by NPS Committee for discussion with staff side (JCM) on 10- 02-2017, the main issues such as (1) Scrapping of NPS (2) Guaranteed minimum pension to NPS subscribers ie; 50% of the last pay drawn should be guaranteed by Government as minimum pension, even if the returns from the annuity insurance scheme is less than 50% and (3) exemption of Central Government employees from the purview of NPS, are not included as agenda for discussion in the meeting. During the discussion with staff side on 10-02-2017, Additional Secretary (Pension) informed the following:
[post_ads_2]
(1) Withdrawal of NPS is not within the purview of NPS Committee.
[Next]
(2) There are three sub committees constituted on NPS (i) Committee chaired by Joint Secretary, Department of Financial Services to look into investment, benefit and taxation, (ii) Committee chaired by Joint Secretary (Expenditure), Finance Ministry, with regard to finalising the accounting, implementation procedure and grievance redressal. (iii) Committee chaired by Additional Secretary (Pension) to formulate Rules and Regulations with regard to various benefits from NPS.

Thus it is made clear without any ambiguity that NPS Committee is constituted by the Government for further strengthening NPS and not for scrapping NPS or exempting from NPS as demanded by NJCA. Everybody knows that whether it is pay commission or NPS Committee, it cannot and will not make recommedations on any issue which are not included in the terms of reference of the Commission/Committee, specifically by the Government. Submitting memorandum to the NPS committee demanding scrapping of NPS or exemption from NPS may not serve any purpose, unless Government give clear mandate to the Committee to examine such a demand also. Thus, NDA Government has rejected the demand of NJCA either to scrap NPS or exempt from NPS. This is the real fact and there need not be any confusion in the mind of the employees. In order to compel the Government to accept the demand, there is no short-cut, other than reviving the indefinite strike.

Railway Federations demand also rejected:

Railway Federations have demanded exemption of Railway employees from the purview of NPS. Railway Ministers of UPA and NDA Government had forwarded the demand to the Government with their recommendations stating that Railways is second line of defence and as Military Personnel are already exempted from NPS, Railway employees should also be exempted from NPS. Earlier in a letter dated 15th May 2015 addressed to Railway Board, the Ministry of Finance, Department of Financial Services has informed as follows:-

“It may kindly be noted that, earlier a proposal to exempt paramilitary forces (ie. CRPF, BSF etc.) from the ambit of NPS was referred to a Group of Ministers (GoM) and was finally not approved by the Government………… You will agree that moving away from the earlier defined benefit based pension system was a concious decision of the Government taken in view of the unsustainable pension liability of the Central Government……. In view of the above, request of the recognised Federations (AIRF & NFIR) for seeking exemption of the Railway Servants appointed on or after 01-01-2004 from the application of the NPS does not seem to be a feasible proposition.”

From the above reply, it is clear that Government is not going to exempt Railway employees or other Central Government employees from the purview of NPS, unless NJCA revive the indefinite strike and compell the Government to negotiate and settle the demand.
[Next]
2. OPTION – I FOR PRE-2016 PENSIONERS REJECTED:

In the meeting held on 30-06-2016, with Group of Ministers by JCM staff side, the Finance Minister had also clarified that Government has taken the decision to implement the recommendation of 7th CPC to bring about parity between past and present pensioners. (Vide NJCA Statement issued on 06-07-2016). Finance Minister categorically assured the NJCA leaders on 30-06-2016 that the Government has accepted the recommendation in toto and Pension department has only been asked to sort out the difficulties in implementation of Option-I, if any.

NJCA wrote to Finance Minister on 16-07-2016, as follows:

“The issue of acceptance of Option-I and II was discussed with your goodself at the residence of Hon’ble Home Minister (Govt. of India) wherein Hon’ble Minister for Railways and Hon’ble MoS Railways were present. You had categorically agreed our demand that no dilution would be made in the options given to the Pensioners by the 7th CPC. It is unfortunate that a rider “subject to feasibility” has been imposed on Option-I. Sir, this is very unfair and we will appreciate, if you kindly get the sentence “subject to feasibility” removed from that order, to keep your promise also”.

But, Finance Minister had gone back from his assurance to JCM Staff side leaders and he refused to withdraw the condition “subject to feasibility”. In the letter dated 17-10-2016, addressed to Chairman of the “Pension Option-I Committee”, the Secretary, JCM staff side requested as follows:

“The attempt therefore must be to explore the ways and means of implementing the said recommendation which is beneficial to a large number of pensioners, especially those retired prior to 1996. In view of this, the staff side is of the firm view that the Government issue orders for implementation of Option-I as there is no room for stating that the recommendation is impossible to be implemented for those who are benefitted by the said option”.

Finally NJCA wrote a letter to Hon’ble Home Minister Shri. Rajnath Singh on 17-01-2017, requesting intervention. The letter reads as follows:

“The Central Government Pensioners numbering presently more than the working employees are aggrieved of the fact that the one and the only recommendation of the 7th CPC which was in their favour ie; Option-I have been recommended to be rejected by the Pension Department to the Government”.

Inspite of all these, the proposal is submitted to cabinet to reject Option-I. This underlines the fact that unless NJCA revive its deferred indefinite strike, the Government will not allow Option-I to pensioners, as assured by Finance Minister.
[Next]
3.ARREARS ON ALLOWANCES INCLUDING HRA AND TRANSPORT ALLOWANCE IS GOING TO BE REJECTED:

Now it has become clear that the Government has constituted the Allowance Committee headed by Finance Secretary, mainly to delay the implementation of enhanced allowances and finally deny the arrears by implementing the revised allowance either from 01-01-2017 or from 01-04-2017. The four months time fixed for the Allowance Committee is already extended to six months upto 22-02-2017. Reserve Bank Governor, Dr. Urjit Patel had hinted to the media that the burden of payment of arrears during this financial year will not be there, meaning that Government may not give retrospective effect to the revised allowances. The RBI Governor, Dr. Urjit Patel made the following observations, which is published in the RBI website.

“The extension of two months given to the Ministry of Finance to receive the notification on higher allowances under the Pay Commission’s award could push its fuller effect into the next financial year rather than this financial year”.

Further, the Allowance Committee has not held any negotiation with the JCM Staff Side. It just heard the views of the staff side. The request of the JCM staff side to hold one more meeting with staff side NJCM was not favourably considered by the Finance Secretary, who is the Chairman of the Allowance Committee. No indication is given as to whether the percentage of HRA recommended by 7th CPC will be enhanced to 30%, 20% and 10%. The fate of other allowances are also the same. Unless NJCA take a firm stand and negotiate with the Government by reviving the indefinite strike, the employees will be placed in a desperate and helpless situation, if Government is allowed to unilaterally declare the HRA and other allowances, without retrospective effect from 01-01-2016, and also without much modification, thereby denying crores of rupees as arrears.
[Next]
4. REVISION OF MINIMUM PAY, FITMENT FORMULA – HIGH LEVEL COMMITTEE NOT YET CONSTITUTED:

While deferring the indefinite strike from 11th July 2016, as per the assurance given by the Group of Ministers, the NJCA in its statement dated 06-07-2016, stated as follows:

“The committee set up to look into the matter of minimum wage and fitment formula is expected to submit their report to the Government in the given time frame of not more than four months”.

Finance Ministry’s press statement issued on 06-07-2016 also stated as follows:

“The Ministers assured the Union leaders that the issues raised by them would be considered by a High Level Committee”.

After one month, the NJCA wrote letters on 28-07-2016 to Hon’ble Home Minister, Finance Minister, Railway Minister and Cabinet Secretary in which it conveyed the following:

“It is a matter of concern that, despite elapsing of a pretty long time, nothing has been heard in this regard from the Government of India, which is leading to serious resentment amongst the Central Government employees.”

Again after two months the JCM staff side, Secretary, wrote a letter on 12-08-2016, to Shri. Arun Jaitely, Finance Minister –

“We are expecting a quick action on the part of the Government to operationalise the assurance of setting up a High Level Committee to go into the Minimum Wage, Multiplication factor etc. However, we are disappointed that even after a lapse of more than a month, no orders have been issued by the Government in this regard ………. we therefore appeal to you that the concerned authorities may be asked to expedite the issuance of orders setting up the committee and finalisation of the report within the available time of remaining three months.”

A group of Senior Officers invited the JCM staff side on 30-08-2016 to discuss the grievances arising out of the recommendations related to 7th CPC. No High Level Committee was constituted and no terms of reference was notified. The second meeting with Group of seniors was held on 24-10-2016.

Eventhough the group of senior officers held two round of discussion with JCM staff side, surprisingly they had not come prepared to discuss increase in minimum wage and fitment formula. They made a mockery of the meeting by disclosing in the first meeting that they are not fully aware of the details of the issues to be discussed and in the second meeting they told that they came for discussing allowances (though another committee under the chairmanship of Finance Secretary is constituted for allowances) and not minimum wage and fitment formulas. The JCM staffside leaders felt humiliated.

After that meeting, the JCM staffside wrote the following letter on 26-10-2016, to Hon’ble Finance Minister…..

“We (staff side) interacted with the said committee headed by Shri. P. K. Das, Addl. Secretary (Expenditure) on 24-10-2016. It would be quite appropriate to bring to your kind notice that, we have felt, during the course of meeting, that the proceedings of the committee are extremely disappointing and are left with the impression that committee is dilly-dallying the issue…….. we are, therefore, left with no option, but to address this communication with the fervent hope that, your goodself will direct the said committee to interact with the staff side in a fruitful manner and arrive at a mutually agreeable proposal on the issue of minimum pay and fitment formula…. We have full trust and believe that, the Government would honour the decision taken in the meeting held on 30-06- 2016 in your benign presence and suitable direction will be given to the committee to complete the assigned task within the stipulated time frame in a satisfactory manner…. It would be the most unfortunate development, we regret to state, if we are constrained to tread the path of struggle once again in the event of the committee not coming up with a satisfactory settlement.”

Inspite of all these, after that (ie after 24-10-2016) no meeting of the group of senior officers was held and no discussion on minimum wage and fitment formula took place. The four months time fixed for the High Level Committee (which is yet to constituted) expired on 30-10-2016. Government has gone back from the most important assurance given to the NJCA leaders on 30-06-2016 by the Group of Cabinet Ministers. NJCA decided to defer the strike mainly because of this assurance of the Govt. that the Minimum pay and fitment formula will be enhanced. Now that Govt. has gone back and betrayed the entire Central Govt. employees and pensioners. NJCA has no other option but to revive the indefinite strike.
[next]
5.“VERY GOOD” BENCH MARK FOR MACP AND DENIAL OF PROMOTIONAL HEIRACHY

Eversince, the MACP scheme was introduced in 2008, confederation and the JCM staff side has been demanding promotional hierarchy instead of grade pay hierarchy. Govt, instead of considering this genuine demand, suddenly issued orders imposing “very good” bench mark condition for MACP. The JCM staffside was not even consulted. JCM staff side, secretary wrote a letter to cabinet secretary on 28-07-2016 as follows:

“The Govt. has accepted one of the adverse recommendations of 7th CPC without holding any consultation with the staff side. The recommendation of the 7th CPC regarding bench mark for performance appraisal for promotion and financial upgradation under MACPs, to be enhanced from “Good” to “very good”, has been accepted by the Govt. without considering the implication on the morale of the Central Government employees… We are of the firm opinion that Govt. should reconsider their decision on the above issues and we request you to kindly withdraw the same.”

Subsequently the case was discussed in the JCM standing committee meeting also on 25-10-2016, as an agenda item given by staff side. Inspite of all these, the Government is not ready to withdraw or modify the orders.

This shows the attitude of the BJP led NDA Govt. towards JCM staff side and Central Govt. employees.

6. NATIONAL ANOMALY COMMITTEE

The National Anomaly Committee was constituted on 09-09-2016. Two meetings are held to discuss the anomaly regarding calculation of Disability Pension for Defence force personnel. As per the definition of anomaly notified by the Government no genuine “anomaly” can be termed as “anomaly”. Hence the JCM staff side has demanded to modify the definition of anomaly, as defined in earlier National Anomaly Committees constituted by Govt. at the time of previous pay commissions. But till this day, Govt. has not conceded the request of the staff side.

7.OTHER ISSUES RAISED IN THE CHARTER OF DEMANDS SUCH AS GDS ISSUES,CASUAL-CONTRACT LABOUR’S ISSUES, UPGRADATION OF LDC PAY SCALE,PARITY WITH CENTRAL SECRETARIAT SERVICES, AUTONOMOUS BODY PENSIONER’S CASE, EQUAL PAY FOR EQUAL WORK, REDUCTION OF CCL, RESTORATION OF ADVANCES ETC.

None of the above demands are discussed with the JCM staff side.
[Next]
WHY INDEFINITE STRIKE SHOULD BE REVIVED BY NJCA

From the above it is clear that the Government has gone back from all the assurances and is not ready to take the JCM staffside seriously. All the employees and pensioners are totally disappointed and are voicing their anger and protest through various forums including social media.

It is in this background the much awaited meeting of NJCA was held on 17- 01-2017. Unfortunately, no consensus decision for revival of the deferred indefinite strike could be taken in the NJCA meeting. As stated above, the revival of the indefinite strike is the only option left before the NJCA.

SIGNIFICANCE OF 16th MARCH 2017, ONE DAY STRIKE OF CONFEDERATION

The 25th National Conference of the Confederation of Central Govt. employees & Workers, held at Chennai had taken a decision to request all constituents of NJCA to revive the deferred indefinite strike, if the Government is not ready to honour its commitment before 30th October 2016, ie; before the four months timeline fixed for fulfilling the assurances given to the NJCA leaders on 30-06-2016 by none other than the senior cabinet Ministers, Shri. Rajnath Singh, Shri. Arun Jaitley and Shri. Suresh Prabhu.

The AIC further decided that, in case NJCA is not ready to revive the deferred indefinite strike, the confederation should organise independent trade union action including strike. Confederation strongly feels that, now that almost eight months are over after the “sacred” assurances given by Honourable Ministers, there is no meaning in going on waiting indefinitely. Further Govt. has already conveyed its decision that Option-I for Pensioners is rejected and withdrawal of NPS is not within the purview of NPS committee. Govt. had unilaterally imposed “adverse” conditions for grant of MACP. Allowances are already delayed for 14 months (from the date of effect of 7th CPC) and the arrears are likely to be denied. The so called “High Level Committee” is yet to be constituted.

As no consensus decision for revival of indefinite strike could be taken in the NJCA, confederation has decided to organise one day nationwide protest strike on 16th March, 2017. Response from employees & participation in the countrywide demonstrations, Mass Dharnas and 15th December 2016 Parliament March was unprecedented and magnificent. About more than 13 lakhs Central Government employees will participate in the strike. After reviewing the participation, confederation will decide future course of action including indefinite strike, if situation warrants.

The National Secretariat of the Confederation calls upon all Central Government employees to make the one day strike a grand success by ensuring your participation in the strike.

AWAKE, ARISE, UNITE COMRADES! 
RALLY ROUND CONFEDETATION!!

“UNITY FOR STRUGGLE AND STRUGGLE FOR UNITY”

“An iron-like determination is the guarantee for success of every movement, this should not be forgotten even for a moment. However ruthless may be the ruling class, they cannot change the tide of the history. It is the masses that alone can bring real change through their indomitable strength and courage. It is not the question of appealing to the sense of injustices of the Government, but the relative strength of the organised movements and the forces combating it, that is going to decide the course of history”.

= Late Com. K. G. Bose, the spark that revolutionised the Central Govt. employees movement with the message of “unity for struggle and struggle for unity”.

M. Krishnan
Secretary General
Confederation
Mob & WhatsApp : 09447068125
email: mkrishnan6854@gmail.com

Source: [Confederation ##eye##]

Disbursement of salary for the month of February 2017 on 27th February 2017

$
0
0
Disbursement of salary for the month of February 2017 on 27th February 2017

F.No.S-11012/2/3(17)/RBI/2015/RBD/74-124
Government of India
Ministry of Finance, Department of Expenditure
Controller General of Accounts
Mahalekha Niyantrak Bhawan,
E-Block, GPO Complex, INA. New Delhi-110023
Tel: 24665384, Fax: 24649365 E-mail: sao-rbd@nic.in

Dated 23rd February 2017

Office Memorandum

Subject: Disbursement of salary for the month of February 2017 on 27th February 2017 on account of nationwide bank strike on 28th February 2017.
[post_ads]
The United Forum of Bank Unions (UFBU) has given a nationwide strike call on 28th February, 2017. Banks are likely to remain closed on that day and even files for the e-payment of salary for the month of February 2017 which is due for 28th February, 2017 may not get processed resulting in salary of Central Government employees not being disbursed on 28th February 2017.

There being banks holidays on account of Maha Shivaratri (24th February, 2017) at many places, 4th Saturday (25th February, 2017) and Sunday (26th February, 2017), Hence, salary e-payment files processed on PFMS/COMPACT should be uploaded today i.e. 23rd February, 2017 with NPB of 27th February, 2017. If such files have already been uploaded with NPB of 28th February, 2017 the same also would need to be changed to facilitate payment of salaries on 27th February, 2017.

All Ministries/Departments are requested to take necessary action to upload their salary payments e-files latest by 23rd February, 2017 with NPB of 27th February, 2017 so that salary to the Central Government employees are paid in time.

All accredited banks are also requested to follow the above directions and release the salary for the month of February 2017 on 27th February 2017.

(Neeraj Kumar Sharma)
Dy.Controller General of Accounts(RBD)

[post_ads_2]

Source: [CGA.nic.in Click to download]

केंद्रीय लोक उपक्रमों (CPSE) के कर्मियों का न्यूनतम वेतन 30,000, सीएमडी की सैलरी 3.7 लाख रुपये करने की सिफारिश

$
0
0
केंद्रीय लोक उपक्रमों (CPSE) के कर्मियों का न्यूनतम वेतन 30,000, सीएमडी की सैलरी 3.7 लाख रुपये करने की सिफारिश

नई दिल्ली: केंद्रीय लोक उपक्रमों (सीपीएसई) के लिए तीसरे वेतन आयोग ने उपक्रमों के कार्यकारियों के लिए न्यूनतम वेतन 30,000 रुपये प्रति माह और चेयमैरन-प्रबंध निदेशक (सीएमडी) के लिए अधिकतम 3.7 लाख रुपये मासिक वेतन रखे जाने की सिफारिश की है. सिफारिशों के अनुसार निदेशक मंडल स्तर से नीचे के कार्यकारियों के लिए न्यूनतम मासिक वेतन 12,600 रुपये से बढ़ाकर न्यूनतम 30,000 रुपये प्रति माह किए जाने की सिफारिश की गई है. हालांकि, सीएमडी के मामले में अनुसूची ए सीपीएसई के लिए अधिकतम वेतन 3.7 लाख रुपये मासिक किए जाने की सिफारिश की गई है.

अनुसूची बी, सी और डी श्रेणी के केंद्रीय लोक उपक्रमों के मामले में अधिकतम मासिक वेतन क्रमश: 3.2 लाख रुपये, 2.9 लाख रुपये और 2.8 लाख रुपये करने की सिफारिश की गई है. न्यायमूर्ति सतीश चंद्रा समिति की सिफारिशें 1 जनवरी, 2017 से अमल में आएंगी. इसे मंजूरी के लिए केंद्रीय मंत्रिमंडल के पास रखा जाएगा.

[post_ads]

लाभ के आधार पर सार्वजनिक उपक्रमों को विभिन्न अनुसूची में वर्गीकृत किया जाता है. सर्वाधिक मुनाफे वाली कंपनी को अनुसूची ए में रखा जाता है. देश में अनुसूची ए के अंतर्गत 64, बी के अंतर्गत 68, सी के अंतर्गत 45 और डी के अंतर्गत चार लोक उपक्रम हैं. समिति ने आवास भत्ता (एचआरए) के बारे में भी सिफारिशें की है. समिति के अनुसार औद्योगिक महंगाई भत्ता (आईडीए) प्रतिरूप में किसी बदलाव की सिफारिश नहीं की गई है और 100 प्रतिशत महंगाई भत्ता होने पर उसे निरपेक्ष (न्यूट्रिलाइज) करने का काम पहले की तरह जारी रहेगा.

समिति ने मूल वेतन में सालाना इंक्रीमेंट तीन प्रतिशत रखने को जारी रखने का सुझाव दिया है. उसने सीपीएसई कर्मचारियों के सेवानिवृत्ति आयु में कोई बदलाव नहीं करने की सिफारिश की है. समिति ने यह भी कहा है कि ईसाप सीपीएसई और उसके कर्मचारी दोनों के लिए फायदेमंद है. समिति ने अपनी सिफारिश में कहा है कि अपने अधिशेष संसाधनों के साथ स्वैच्छिक सेवानिवृत्ति की लागत का वहन करने वाली लाभ कमा रही कंपनियों को वीआरएस नीति क्रियान्वित करने की अनुमति होगी.

[post_ads_2]

Read at: NDTV

7वां वेतन आयोग : अलाउंस समिति ने HRA पर दी अपनी रिपोर्ट, मिलेगी खुशी और गम भी, फैसला 8 मार्च के बाद

$
0
0
7वां वेतन आयोग : अलाउंस समिति ने एचआरए (HRA) पर दी अपनी रिपोर्ट, मिलेगी खुशी और गम भी
7cpc-allowance-committee-news-main-point

नई दिल्ली: 7वें वेतन आयोग (7th Pay Commission) के कई मुद्दों के लेकर उठे विवादों में कर्मचारियों ने एचआरए की दर पर भी आपत्ति जताई थी. सरकार ने तमाम मुद्दों पर बातचीत के लिए तीन समितियों को गठन किया था जिनको कर्मचारियों के प्रतिनिधियों से बातचीत के लिए अधिकृत किया गया था. इन  समितियों में एक समिति वित्त सचिव अशोक लवासा के नेतृत्व में बनाई गई थी. इसी समिति के पास अलाउंस का मुद्दा भी था. महीने की 22 तारीख को इस समिति की अंतिम बैठक हुई थी जिसमें कर्मचारियों से अंतिम बार अलाउंस के मुद्दे पर चर्चा पूरी की गई थी. अलाउंस समिति से बातचीत करने के लिए कर्मचारियों के संयुक्त संगठन एनजेसीए के प्रतिनिधि शामिल हुए थे. सूत्र बता रहे हैं कि समिति ने अपनी रिपोर्ट तैयार कर सरकार को सौंप दी है. अब यह रिपोर्ट कैबिनेट की बैठक में रखी जाएगी. हालांकि रिपोर्ट के तथ्य अभी तक सार्वजनिक नहीं हुए हैं. लेकिन यह कहा जा रहा है कि समिति ने कर्मचारियों की मांग पर सकारात्मक रुख अपनाया है. यह भी साफ माना जा रहा है कि सरकार इस बारे में अपना फैसला 8 मार्च के बाद घोषित करेगी क्योंकि इस दिन देश में पांच राज्यों में जारी विधानसभा चुनाव के अंतिम चरण का मतदान होगा.

[post_ads]

माना जा रहा है कि सरकार ने ट्रांस्पोर्ट अलाउंस (यात्रा भत्ता) को दो भागों में बांटा है. एक सीसीए और दूसरा पूर्ववत की तरह दिया जाने वाला टीए है. यह पांचवें वेतन आयोग की भांति देय होगा, ऐसा माना जा रहा है. यह भी कहा जा रहा है  कि इनको डीए से अलग कर दिया जाएगा और यह फिक्स स्लैब रेट पर तय होगा.

यह कहा जा रहा है कि समिति ने कर्मचारियों की मांग को मानते हुए एचआरए की दर को छठे वेतन आयोग की रिपोर्ट के हिसाब से देने की बात को स्वीकार कर लिया है. दूसरा सबसे अहम सवाल अब भी बना हुआ है कि सरकार ने एचआरए को कब से देने की बात को स्वीकार किया है. यह प्रश्न अभी भी कर्मचारियों को सता रहा है. क्या यह दर 1.1.16 से लागू की गई है या फिर 1.4.17 से यह लागू होगी. जहां तक कर्मचारियों का सवाल है वह इसे पिछले साल जनवरी से लागू करवाने की मांग करते रहे हैं और सरकार की ओर से कुछ समय पहले ऐसा इशारा मिला था कि सभी विवादित अलाउंस को 1 अप्रैल 2017 से लागू किया जाएगा.

इस संबंध में जीसीएम के सचिव और कर्मचारी नेता राघवैया ने एनडीटीवी को बताया कि सरकार की ओर से जो संकेत मिल रहे हैं उसके हिसाब से सभी भत्ते जिनमें विवाद था और जिनपर सरकार से चर्चा हुई यह 1 जनवरी 2016 की बजाय 1 अप्रैल 2017 से लागू हो सकते हैं. इससे यह साफ है कि कर्मचारियों को मलाल होगा कि उन्हें जो बढ़े हुए भत्ते का एरियर मिलना चाहिए वह अब नहीं मिलेगा. उन्होंने बताया कि 22 फरवरी को सभी अलाउंस को लेकर सरकार से अंतिम बार बातचीत हुई थी और कर्मचारियों की ओर से साफ कर दिया गया था कि एचआरए 30, 20, 10 के अनुपात में दिया जाना चाहिए. यह भी बात साफ है कि अलाउंस समिति ने सभी अलाउंसेस पर कर्मचारी नेताओं से बातचीत कर ली है.

जानकारी के लिए बता दें कि कर्मचारियों की मांग है कि एचआरए को पुराने फॉर्मूले के आधार पर तय किया जाए या फिर इसकी दर बढ़ाई जाए. केंद्रीय कर्मचारियों का कहना है कि वर्तमान में तय फॉर्मूला के हिसाब से एचआरए कर्मचारियों को पहले की तुलना में कम मिलने लगा है.

[post_ads_2]

बता दें कि सातवें वेतन आयोग (Seventh Pay Commission) द्वारा केन्द्रीय कर्मचारियों को दिए जाने वाले कई भत्तों को लेकर असमंजस की स्थिति है. नरेंद्र मोदी सरकार ने 2016 में सातवें वेतन आयोग (7th Pay Commission) की सिफारिशों को मंजूरी दी थी और 1 जनवरी 2016 से 7वें वेतन आयोग की रिपोर्ट को लागू किया था. लेकिन, भत्तों के साथ कई मुद्दों पर असहमति होने की वजह से इन सिफारिशें पूरी तरह से लागू नहीं हो पाईं. अब जब अशोक लवासा समिति ने अपनी रिपोर्ट सरकार को सौंप दी है और जल्द ही वित्तमंत्री अरुण जेटली इस रिपोर्ट पर कोई अंतिम फैसला सरकार की ओर से ले लेंगे.

कहा जा रहा है कि सरकार की ओर से बातचीत के लिए अधिकृत अधिकारी एचआरए को 1 स्तर ऊपर करने को तैयार हुए हैं अब एचआरए 30%, 20% और 10% तक हो सकता है. वहीं, विश्वसनीय सूत्रों के हवाले से खबर मिल रही है कि बड़े शहरों में इसे 30 प्रतिशत किया जा सकता है, लेकिन यह अभी तय नहीं है.

कर्मचारी संगठन का कहना रहा है कि अगर सरकार ने एचआरए बढ़ाया नहीं है तो घटा कैसे सकती हैं. अपने तर्क के समर्थन में कर्मचारियं की दलील है कि क्या शहरों में मकान का किराया कम हुआ है. क्या मकान सस्ते हो गए हैं. जब यह नहीं हुआ है तो सरकार अपने कर्मचारियों के साथ अन्याय कैसे कर सकती है.

बता दें कि वेतन आयोग (पे कमीशन) ने अपनी रिपोर्ट में एचआरए को आरंभ में 24%, 16% और 8% तय किया था और कहा गया था कि जब डीए 50 प्रतिशत तक पहुंच जाएगा तो यह 27%, 18% और 9% क्रमश: हो जाएगा. इतना ही नहीं वेतन आयोग (पे कमिशन) ने यह भी कहा था कि जब डीए 100% हो जाएगा तब यह दर 30%, 20% और 10% क्रमश : एक्स, वाई और जेड शहरों के लिए हो जाएगी.

उल्लेखनीय है कि कर्मचारियों के संयुक्त संगठन एनजेसीए ने गठित वेतन आयोग के समक्ष अपनी मांग से संबंधित ज्ञापन में इस दर को क्रमश: 60%, 40% और 20% करने के लिए कहा था. संगठन का आरोप है कि आयोग ने कर्मचारियों की मांग को पूरी तरह से ठुकरा दिया था. उनका कहना है कि वेतन आयोग ने इस रेट को छठे वेतन आयोग से भी कम कर दिया है. इनका कहना है कि क्योंकि इसे डीए के साथ जोड़ा गया है तो यह तभी बढ़ेगा जब डीए की दर तय प्रतिशत तक बढ़ जाएगी.

जानकारी के लिए बता दें कि सातवां वेतन आयोग से पहले केंद्रीय कर्मचारी 196 किस्म के अलाउंसेस के हकदार थे. लेकिन सातवें वेतन आयोग ने कई अलाउंसेस को समाप्त कर दिया या फिर उन्हें मिला दिया जिसके बाद केवल 55 अलाउंस बाकी रह गए. तमाम कर्मचारियों को कई अलाउंस समाप्त होने का मलाल है. क्योंकि कई अलाउंस अभी तक लागू नहीं हुए और कर्मचारियों को उसका सीधा लाभ नहीं मिला है तो कर्मचारियों को लग रहा है कि वेतन आयोग की रिपोर्ट अभी लागू नहीं हुई.

बता दें कि सातवें वेतन आयोग की रिपोर्ट से कर्मचारियों की कई शिकायतें रही हैं और ऐसे में केंद्र की नरेंद्र मोदी सरकार ने अपने कर्मचारियों की शिकायतों को दूर करने के लिए संबंधित मंत्रालय और वित्तमंत्रालय के अधीन समितियों का गठन किया है. ये समितियां कर्मचारी नेताओं से बात कर रही हैं और इस समितियों को अपना फैसला चार महीने में सरकार को देना था लेकिन अभी तक सात महीने से ज्यादा समय बीत चुका है और अभी तक किसी भी समिति ने अपनी रिपोर्ट नहीं सौंपी है.

[post_ads]
Read at: NDTV

7th CPC CGHS Subscription: Clarification for Pensioners/Family Pensioners

$
0
0
7th CPC CGHS Subscription: Clarification for Pensioners/Family Pensioners OM dated 09-02-2017 & 21-02-2017

No. S.11011/11/2016- CGHS (P)/EHS
Government of India
Ministry of Health and Family Welfare
EHS Section

Nirman Bhawan, New Delhi
Dated the 9 February, 2017

OFFICE MEMORANDUM

Sub: Revision of rates of subscription under Central Government Health Scheme due to revision of pay and allowances of Central Government employees and revision of pension/ family pension on account of implementation of recommendations of the Seventh Central Pay Commission- clarification reg.

Attention is drawn to this Ministry’s [OM of even No. dated 9th January, 2017 ##eye##] and a subsequent [OM of even no. dated 13/1/2017 ##eye##], on the subject mentioned above.

[post_ads]

2. This Ministry has been receiving several representations w.r.t. applicability of CGHS rates to pensioners superannuating on 31/1/2017. The matter has been examined in this Ministry and it is clarified that ‘those employees superannuating on or before 31/1/2017 and had submitted their application on or before 31/1/2017 may be allowed the subscription at the prevalent rates applicable as on 31/1/2017 vide OM No.  S.110111/2/2008-CGHS (P) dated 20/5/2009. Pensioners applying for CGHS pensioner card on annual/lifetime basis after 31/1/2017 will have to pay as per the revised rates effective from 1/2/2017 vide OM of even no. dated 13/1/2017’.

3. This issues with the approval of the Competent Authority.

(Bindu Tewari)
Director
cghs-pensioners-subscrition-om

Order: [www.cghs.gov.in ##download##]

[post_ads_2]

7th CPC CGHS Subscription: Clarification for Pensioners/Family Pensioners OM dated 21-02-2017


No. 5.11011/11/2016- CGHS (P)/EHS
Government of India
Ministry of Health and Family Welfare
EHS Section

Nirman Bhawan, New Delhi
Dated the 21st February, 2017

OFFICE MEMORANDUM

Sub: Revision of rates of subscription under Central Government Health Scheme clue to revision of pay and allowances of Central Government employees and revision of pension/ family pension on account of implementation of recommendations of the Seventh Central Pay Commission- clarification reg.

Attention is drawn to this Ministry’s OM of even No. dated 9th February, 2017 on the subject mentioned above.

2. This Ministry has been receiving several representations w.r.t applicability of CGHS rates to pensioners superannuating on 31/1/2017. The matter has been examined in this Ministry and it has been decided that ‘employees, who had superannuated on 31/1/2017 may be allowed to apply for CGHS pensioner card by paying the subscription at the prevalent rates applicable as on 31/1/2017 vide OM no. 5.110111/2/2008-CGHS (P) dated 20/5/2009 till 15th March 2017.'

3. This issues with the approval of the Competent Authority.

(Sunil Kumar Gupta)
Under Secretary to the Govt. of India
cghs-pensioners-subscrition-om-dt-21-feb-2017

Order: [www.cghs.gov.in ##download##]


7th CPC Pay Fixation - Bunching of stages in the Revised pay structure in the grade of Assistant Section Officers: DoPT Order

$
0
0
Bunching of stages in the Revised pay structure in the grade of Assistant Section Officers: DoPT Order

F.No.7/1/2017-CS-I(A) (Pt.)
Government of India
Department of Personnel &, Training
2nd Floor, Lok Nayak Bhawan
Khan Market, New Delhi - 3
Dated 27.02.17

OFFICE MEMORANDUM

Subject: Bunching of stages in the Revised pay structure in the grade of Assistant Section Officers - Reg.

DoP&T has been receiving many references from various Ministries/ Departments seeking clarification on the issue of grant of bunching to Assistant Section Officers of Central Secretariat Service in terms of Department of Expenditure’s O.M. dated 07.09.16.

[post_ads]

2. It has also been noticed that there have been divergent views on the matter that while some Ministries/ Departments have given the benefit on their own, some other Ministries /Departments have sought clarifications on various issues they are facing while giving the benefit of bunching in terms of DoE’s O.M. dated 07.09.16.

3. The matter has been taken up for further clarifications with Establishment Division / Department of Expenditure briefly on the following issues:

i. While the Seventh Pay Commission had not prescribed different modes of pay fixation for Direct Recruit (DR) and Promotee ASOs, there have been two different modes of pay fixation for DR and Promotees prior to implementation of Seventh Pay Commission. Due to differential methods of pay fixation, required differential of 30/0 is not calculable based on seniority alone as the other relevant facts of being DR/Promotee comes into play here.

ii. The manner of different pay fixation for DR A80 and promotee Assistants has been challenged in various court cases (viz. OA No.2147/2015, OA No.150/2016, OA No.1015/2013 and OA No.476/2015 etc.)

4. It has already been decided to consult Department of Expenditure through Establishment (Pay) in the matter and same is under examination. Therefore, to ensure uniform implementation of Department of Expenditure’s instruction, all the Ministries/ Departments are advised to wait for further instructions with regard to grant of bunching benefits to ASOs of CSS and also if orders have already been issued by any Ministry/ Department, the same may not be given effect till further instructions.

5. This issues with the approval of competent authority.

sd/-
(K. Srinlvasan)
Under Secretary to the Government of India

[post_ads_2]

Source: [DoPT Order Click to view/download ##download##]

Charges and incentive structure under NPS Lite w.e.f. 01.04.2017

$
0
0
Charges and incentive structure under NPS Lite w.e.f. 01.04.2017

PENSION FUND REGULATORY AND DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

CIRCULAR

CIR No: PFRDA/2017/5/SWM/1
Date: 20th February, 2017

To,
All Aggregators

Subject: Charges and incentive structure under NPS Lite w.e.f. 01.04.2017

1. As per the existing revenue structure for Aggregators under NPS-Lite/Swavalamban, till 2016-17 the Aggregators are paid Rs. 100/- for opening/servicing every persistent NPS-Lite/Swavalamban account, provided the contribution deposited by the subscriber is between Rs. 1000/- to Rs. 12000/-in a financial year. However, the incentive is applicable till 31.03.2017 only.

[post_ads]

2. In order to continue the incentives for the Aggregators even after 31.03.2017 so that they continue to service the subscriber base of NPS Lite attached to them, the following charge and incentive structure has been approved by PFRDA and will be applicable w.e.f. 01.04.2017:

Charges under NPS-Lite/Swavalamban w.e.f 01.04.2017* Method of living charges
The charges for any subsequent transaction under NPS- Lite/Swavalamban @ 0.25 % of the total contribution deposited by the subscriber in NPS-Lite/Swavalamban in a financial year subject to a minimum of Rs. 20/-. Through unit deduction by NSDL/CRA at the end of the Financial Year
Any other transaction not involving a contribution from subscriber @ Rs. 10/- per transaction

3. All the Aggregators are hereby advised to take note of the same and also disseminate information regarding the same to the associated nodal offices including facilitators.

4. It is further advised that an Aggregator is not permitted to collect any charge or fee upfront from subscriber. In case of any violation of these instructions, suitable action will be initiated as envisaged in the PFRDA (Aggregator) Regulations, 2015.

Ashish Kumar
General Manager

Benchmark for Revised Classification and Promotion: Railway Board Clarification in view of 7th CPC Report

$
0
0
Benchmark for Revised Classification and Promotion: Railway Board Clarification in view of 7th CPC Report on Revised classification and mode of filling up of non-gazetted posts – Scheme for filling up of vacancies after 31.12.2016

RBE No.20/2017

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS
RAILWAY BOARD

No.E(NG)I-2008/PM1/15

New Delhi,dated 03.03.2017

The General Managers (P)
All Indian Railways & PUs.
(As per standard list)
[post_ads]
Sub: Revised classification and mode of filling up of non-gazetted posts – Scheme for filling up of vacancies after 31.12.2016.

Ref: Board’s letters of even no dated 03.09.2009, 07.06.2010, 21.11.2011, 23.05.2012, 15.1.2013, 24.05.2013, 03.01.2014, 16.06.2014, 31.12.2014 & 09.02.2016 on the above subject.

Attention is drawn to Board’s order issued on 03.09.2009, consequent upon implementation of 6th CPC recommendations, regarding mode of filling up of Non-gazetted posts consequent upon merger of grades. The above scheme of such mode of filling up of non-gazetted posts has since been extended from time to time, last validity being till 31.12.2016.

2. 7th CPC, in its report in para 5.1.45 has recommended that benchmark for performance appraisal for MACP as well as for regular promotion be enchanced from ‘Good” to ‘Very Good’. While recommendation for MACP has been accepted by Government and instructions in this regard have been issued vide Board’s letter No.PC-V/2016/MACPS/1 dated 19.12.2016 (RBE No.155/2016), the issue regarding benchmark for regular promotion is still examination in consultation with DoP&T.

3. Accordingly, it has been decided by the Board that till such time instructions for benchmark for regular promotion are issued, the existing methodology and benchmarks for Promotion, as enumerated in the Board’s letters referred to above, may continue till further orders.

Please acknowledge receipt of this letter.

(P.M.Meena)
Deputy Director-II/E(NG)
[post_ads_2]

Timely commencement of family pension in favour of spouse by banks in the event of death of the pensioners: CPAO

$
0
0
Timely commencement of family pension in favour of spouse by banks in the event of death of the pensioners

Government Of India
Ministry Of Finance
Department of Expenditure
Central Pension Accounting Office
Trikoot-II, Bhikaji Cama Place
New Delhi : 110 066

CPAO/IT&Tech/Bank Performance/2016-17/255
27.02.2017

Office Memorandum

Subject: Timely commencement of family pension in favour of spouse by banks in the event of death of the pensioners.
[post_ads]

Attention is invited to this Office OM No. CPAO/Tech/Banks Performance/2015-­16/45 dated-02.06.2016[Sl. No. (i) a & (i) b] followed by minutes of the meeting dated­ 22.08.2016[Para II-(b)] on the above subject whereby Heads of all the CPPCs and Government Business Divisions of the Banks were advised to Commence the family pension to the spouse immediately on receipt of death certificate of the pensioner, proof of spouse age/date of birth and undertaking of recovery of excess payment latest within a month. However, analysis of reports prepared in CPAO regarding time taken in conversion of pension to family pension in favour of spouse of deceased pensioners shows inordinate delay in many cases. The details of these cases are available in CPPC logins on http://eppo.nic.in.

In view of the above, Heads of CPPCs and Government Business Divisions of the banks are advised to review the attached delay report and ensure compliance of the above instructions and submit the status report to CPAO along with reasons for delay by 8th March, 2017 positively by e-mail at vijay.17@gov.in

Sd/-
(Subhash Chandra)
Controller of Accounts
[post_ads_2]
Source: [CPAO.nic.in Click here to view/download ##download##]

Tax Benefits due to Life Insurance Policy, Health Insurance Policy and Expenditure on Medical Treatment

$
0
0
TAX BENEFITS DUE TO LIFE INSURANCE POLICY, HEALTH INSURANCE POLICY AND EXPENDITURE ON MEDICAL TREATMENT


[As amended by Finance Act, 2016]
Introduction

Payment of premium on life insurance policy and health insurance policy not only gives insurance cover to a taxpayer but also offers certain tax benefits. In this part you can gain knowledge about deductions available to a taxpayer on account of payment of life insurance premium, payment of health insurance premium and expenditure on medical treatment.

Total income from all the heads of income is called as “Gross Total Income” (GTI). To arrive at taxable income, one has to deduct from GTI, the deductions allowable under Chapter VIA (i.e., under section 80C to 80U). In other words, we can say that Taxable Income = Gross Total Income less Deductions under section 80C to 80U.

Following general rules should be kept in mind before claiming these deductions under section 80C to 80U:

[post_ads]

1) No deduction under Chapter VI-A (under section 80C to 80U) shall be allowed from the following income:
i) Long-Term Capital Gains.
ii) Short-Term Capital Gains covered under section 111A.
iii) Winnings from lotteries, horse race, etc., referred to in section 115BB.
iv) Income covered under sections 115A, 115AB, 115AC, 115AD, 115BBA and 115D.

2) The aggregate amount of deduction under section 80C to 80U cannot exceed GTI (i.e., GTI excluding incomes referred to above).

The list of deductions under section(s) 80C to 80U is quite long, however, in this part we will gain knowledge on some major deductions covering deductions available to a taxpayer on account of payment of life insurance premium, investment in PPF/NSC, payment of health insurance premium and expenditure on medical treatment.

Deduction in respect of Life Insurance Premium, PPF, NSC, etc. [Section 80C]

Section 80C provides deduction in respect of various items like life insurance premium, investment in Public Provident Fund, investment in NSC, repayment of principal component of housing loan, investment in Post Office Time Deposit Scheme, Senior Citizens Saving Scheme, etc. We will focus on the provisions of section 80C relating to deduction on account of payment of life insurance premium.

Apart from several other items provided under section 80C, a taxpayer, being an individual or a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF), can claim deduction under section 80C in respect of premium on life insurance policy paid by him/it during the year.
[post_ads_2]
Policy to be taken in whose name?

In case of an individual, deduction is available in respect of policy taken in the name of taxpayer or his/her spouse or his/her children. In case of a HUF, deduction is available in respect of policy taken in the name of any of the members of the HUF.

No deduction is available in respect of premium paid in respect of policy taken in the name of any person, other than given above.

Deduction Allowed
Overall deduction u/s 80C (along with deduction u/s 80CCC & 80CCD) allowed is up to Rs. 1,50,000.

Restriction on amount of deduction with respect to capital sum assured
Deduction is restricted to 20% of capital sum assured in respect of policies issued on or before 31-3- 2012 and 10% in case of policies issued on or after 1-4-2012. In case of policy taken on or after 1-4 -2013 in the name of any person suffering from disability or severe disability referred to in section 80U or suffering from disease or ailment as given in section 80DDB, the limit will be 15% of capital sum assured.

Minimum holding period

Following is the minimum holding period in respect of certain investments, deposits, etc., prescribed above which should be kept in mind while claiming deduction under section 80C:

Nature of Investments/DepositsMinimum Holding Period
ULIP of UTI or LIC 5 years
Life insurance policy 2 years
Senior Citizens Saving Scheme and Post Office Time Deposit  5 years

If any of the aforesaid investments, subscriptions, etc., is terminated, sold, etc., before the minimum holding period specified above, then the deduction allowed in earlier years would be deemed as income of the previous year of termination, sale, etc. Further, no deduction will be allowed in respect of contribution, payment, etc., made towards such policy, units, etc. (i.e., which is terminated) during the year of termination.

In case of withdrawal during the life time of depositor from Senior Citizens Savings Scheme or Post Office Time Deposit before the aforesaid period (i.e., before 5 years), the amount received on such withdrawal (excluding interest which is already taxed in earlier years) will be charged to tax in the year of withdrawal.

[post_ads_2]

Illustration
Mr. Raja had made the following payments during the financial year 2016-17 to avail of the advantage of deduction under section 80C:
  1. Premium paid on his life insurance policy of Rs. 8,400. Policy was taken in April 2011 and sum assured was Rs. 25,000.
  1. Premium of Rs. 1,000 on his another life insurance policy. Premium was due in March 2016 but was actually paid in April 2017.
  1. Premium of Rs. 30,000 on life insurance policy taken in the name of his wife. Policy was taken in April 2012 and sum assured was Rs. 2,00,000.
  1. Premium of Rs. 30,000 on life insurance policies taken in the name of his three children (one is minor daughter, second is major married daughter and third is major married son, who is a practicing engineer). The policies are term plans and premium on all the policies worked out to be 5% of capital sum assured.
  1. Premium on life insurance policy taken in the name of his parents who are dependent on him. Premium paid during the year amounted to Rs. 25,200.
  1. Premium on life insurance policy taken in the name of parents of his spouse who are dependent on him. Premium paid during the year amounted to Rs. 2,520.
  1. Premium on life insurance policy taken in the name of his younger brother and sister dependent on him. Premium paid during the year amounted to Rs. 5,000.
  1. Investment in PPF Rs. 60,000.
  1. Investment in NSC Rs. 10,000. Interest accrued during the year on NSC amounted to Rs. 1,000.
  1. Payment of tuition fees of his minor daughter Rs. 5,000.
  1. Repayment of housing loan Rs. 12,000.
  1. Investment in post office time deposit Rs. 10,000.
What will be the quantum of deduction under section 80C for the year 2016-17 which Mr. Raja will be entitled to claim in respect of above payments?
**

(A) The taxpayer can claim deduction under section 80C in respect of premium on life insurance policy paid by him during the year. Deduction is available in respect of policy taken in the name of taxpayer, his spouse and his children. No deduction is available in respect of premium paid in respect of policy taken in the name of any person other than given above. Deduction is restricted to 20% of capital sum assured in respect of policies issued on or before 31-3-2012 and 10% in case of policies issued on or after 1-4-2012. Considering the above provisions, deduction in respect of life insurance premium will be as follows:

1) In respect of premium of Rs. 8,400 on his life insurance policy which is taken in April 2011, deduction will be restricted to 20% of capital sum assured. Sum assured is Rs. 25,000 and 20% of the same will work out to be Rs. 5,000. Hence, out of Rs. 8,400, he will be eligible to claim deduction of Rs. 5,000.

2) Deduction under section 80C is available on payment basis. In respect of premium of Rs. 1,000 on his another policy (which is due in March), no deduction will be available in current year, since the premium is not paid in the current year. Premium is paid in next year and hence, he can claim deduction of Rs. 1,000 in next year.

3) In respect of premium of Rs. 30,000 on life insurance policy taken in the name of his wife, deduction will be restricted to 10% of capital sum assured. Sum assured is Rs. 2,00,000 and 10% of the same will work out to be Rs. 20,000, hence, out of Rs. 30,000, he will be eligible to claim deduction of Rs. 20,000.

4) Premium in respect of policy taken in the name of his children works out to be 5% of capital sum assured. Hence, entire amount of premium of Rs. 30,000 will be eligible for deduction. Further, it should be noted that deduction is allowed for all children irrespective of the fact whether they are dependent/independent, major/minor, or married/unmarried.

5) No deduction is available on account of premium paid in respect of policy taken in the name of any person other than the taxpayer, his spouse and his children. Hence, no deduction will be available in respect of premium paid by him on policy taken in the name of his parents, parents of his spouse and his brother/sister.

6) Total premium eligible for deduction under section 80C will amount to Rs. 55,000 (Rs. 5,000 + Rs. 20,000 + Rs. 30,000).

(B) The taxpayer can claim deduction under section 80C in respect of any contribution made by him towards statutory provident fund or recognised provident fund or approved superannuation fund or public provident fund (PPF). Thus, contribution to PPF of Rs. 60,000 will be eligible for deduction under section 80C.

(C) The taxpayer can claim deduction under section 80C in respect of amount paid by him towards purchase of NSC. Hence, he will be able to claim deduction under section 80C in respect of Rs. 10,000 paid by him towards purchase of NSC.

Accrued interest on NSC is taxed in the hands of the receiver and the same will be treated as an investment during the year of accrual (except for last year) and will qualify for deduction under section 80C. Hence, accrued interest of Rs. 1,000 will be treated as taxable income and on the same hand will also qualify for deduction under section 80C.

(D) The taxpayer can claim deduction under section 80C in respect of amount paid by him during the year towards tuition fees (excluding development fees, donation or similar payments) paid at the time of admission or thereafter, to any university, school, college or other educational institution situated in India, for full time education of any two children of the taxpayer. Hence, Rs. 5,000 paid by him on account of tuition fees of his minor daughter will qualify for deduction under section 80C.

(E) The taxpayer can claim deduction under section 80C in respect of amount paid by him towards repayment of housing loan. Hence, Rs. 12,000 paid by him on account of repayment of housing loan will qualify for deduction under section 80C.

(F) The taxpayer can claim deduction under section 80C in respect of investment made by him in post office time deposit. Hence, he can claim deduction of Rs. 10,000 under section 80C.
Considering above eligible items given in (A) to (F), the eligible amount of deduction will come to Rs. 1,53,000 (*)

However, total deduction under section 80C cannot exceed Rs. 1,50,000, hence, deduction will be limited to Rs. 1,50,000. In other words, Mr. Raja can claim deduction of Rs. 1,50,000 under section 80C.

(*) Rs. 55,000 LIP + Rs. 60,000 PPF + Rs. 11,000 NSC +Rs. 5,000 tuition fees + Rs. 12,000 housing loan + Rs. 10,000 time deposits.

[post_ads]

Deduction in respect of medical insurance premium [Section 80D]

As per section 80D, an individual or a HUF can claim deduction in respect of the following payments:

1) Medical insurance premium paid by assessee, being individual/HUF by any mode other than cash.

2) Any contribution made by assessee, being individual to Central Government Health Scheme or such other Scheme as may be notified by the Central Government.

3) Sum paid by assessee, being individual on account of preventive health check-up. Medical expenditure incurred by assessee, being individual/HUF on the health of a very senior citizen person provided that no amount has been paid to effect or to keep in force an insurance on the health of such person

Policy to be taken or expenditure to be incurred in whose name?

In case of an individual, deduction is available in respect of medical insurance policy taken in his own name, or in the name his/her spouse, his/her parents and his/her dependent children. In case of HUF, the policy can be taken on the health of any member of such HUF.

Deduction on account of medical expenditure shall be allowed only when it is incurred on the health of the aforementioned persons who are very senior citizens.

Very senior citizen’ means an individual resident in India who is of the age of eighty years or more at any time during the relevant previous year.

Amount of deduction

(1) In case of an individual, amount of deduction cannot exceed:

a. Rs. 25,000, in aggregate, in respect of medical insurance premium or any payment made for preventive health check-up (*). [This deduction is available if payment is made for benefit of assessee, himself or his/her spouse or dependent children]

b. Rs. 25,000, in aggregate, in respect of medical insurance premium or any payment made for preventive health check-up (*). [This deduction is available if payment is made for benefit of parents of assessee.]

c. Rs 25,000 in aggregate in respect of contribution made to the Central Government Health Scheme or any scheme notified by the Central Government [This deduction is available if payment is made for benefit of assessee, himself, his/her spouse or dependent children]

d. Rs 30,000 in aggregate in respect of medical expenditure incurred on the health of assessee, himself, his/her spouse or dependent children or parents. [This deduction is available if amount is paid for benefit of a very senior citizen and no amount has been paid to effect or to keep in force an insurance on the health of such person.]

(*) total amount of deduction for the expenditure incurred on preventive health check-up of assessee, his family and parents could not exceed Rs. 5,000.
     
Note: In aforesaid clauses a, b and c additional deduction of Rs 5,000 is available when medical insurance is taken on the life of senior citizen.

Amount of deduction in case of HUF

(2) In case of a HUF, amount of deduction cannot exceed Rs. 25,000, in aggregate, in respect of premium paid by it on health of any member of such HUF.
The aforesaid limit of Rs. 25,000 will be increased to Rs. 30,000 in following situation:

a) When the premium is paid in respect of any senior citizen (i.e., any resident individual of the age of 60 years or above).

b) When medical expenditure is incurred on the health of a very senior citizen person if no amount is paid in respect of health insurance of such person

Mode of Payments
Payment should be made by any mode other than cash (however, payment on account of preventive health check-up can be made in cash).

Illustration
Mr. Raja (age 40 years) has made the following payments during the financial year 2016-17:

1) Payment of medical insurance premium on his policy of Rs. 15,000.

2) Payment of medical insurance premium on policy of his spouse Rs. 4,000.

3) Payment of medical insurance premium on policy of his younger daughter who is dependent on him Rs. 3,000.

4) Payment of medical insurance premium on policy of his elder daughter who is self employed and not dependent on him Rs. 5,000.

5) Payment of medical insurance premium on policy of his parents (resident and aged 68 years), Rs. 18,000 on policy of his father and Rs. 18,000 on policy of his mother. Both are dependent on brother of Mr. Raja.

6) Payment of Rs. 3,000 towards expenditure on preventive health check-up (for his own check-up and check-up of his wife).

Advice Mr. Raja regarding the admissible deduction under section 80D for the year 2016-17.
**

Considering the above provisions, the deduction in case of Mr. Raja will be as follows:

1) Medical insurance premium on his policy of Rs. 15,000 will qualify for deduction.

2) Medical insurance premium on policy of his spouse of Rs. 4,000 will qualify for deduction.

3) Medical insurance premium on policy of Rs. 3,000 of his younger daughter who is dependent on him will qualify for deduction. However, premium of Rs. 5,000 on policy of elder daughter who is not dependent on him will not qualify for deduction.

4) Medical insurance premium on policy of his parents of Rs. 36,000 will qualify for deduction (being Senior Citizens)-limited to Rs. 30,000.

5) Expenditure on preventive health check-up will also qualify for deduction, but, it will be restricted to Rs. 3,000 only (as the overall limit of deduction under section 80D in respect of assessee and his family cannot exceed Rs. 25,000).
 
Thus, total deduction under section 80D will amount to Rs. 22,000 on account of expenditure on premium paid in respect of his own health, health of his spouse and dependent daughter and Rs. 30,000 in respect of premium paid on policy of his parents. Deduction on account of expenditure on preventive health check-up will be Rs. 3,000 Total deduction under section 80D will amount to Rs. 55,000 (Rs. 22,000 + Rs. 30,000 + Rs. 3,000).

Deduction in respect of expenditure on training/medical treatment of a dependent, beinf a person with disability [Section 80DD]

A resident individual/HUF, incurring expenditure on maintenance of relative dependent, being a person with disability, can claim deduction under section 80DD. Deduction is available in respect of any of the following:
(a) Expenditure incurred on medical treatment (including nursing), training, rehabilitation of a dependent person with disability.
(b) Amount paid or deposited under a scheme of LIC or any other insurer or UTI or specified company duly approved by the Board, for maintenance of dependent person with disability.

Dependent person with disability means:

1) In case of an individual, it will include spouse, children, parents, brothers and sisters of the individual, or any of them who is mainly or wholly dependent on such individual; and

2) In case of a HUF, it will include any member of the HUF, who is mainly or wholly dependent on such HUF.

Provided that such dependent person has not claim any deduction under section 80U.

Disability Means:-

Such person is suffering from a specified disability which generally includes blindness, low vision, leprosy-cured, hearing impairment, locomotor’s disability, mental retardation and mental illness [see section 2(i) of the Person with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995 ], it will also include “autism”, “cerebral palsy”, and “multiple disability”, referred to in clauses (a), (c) and (h) of section 2 of National Trust for welfare of Person with Autism, Cerebral Palsy, Mental Retardation and Multiple Disabilities Act, 1999.
Person with severe disability means:-

1.A person with 80% or more of one or more disabilities, as referred to in section 56(4) of the Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995 (1 of 1996); or

2.A person with severe disability referred to in clause (o) of section 2 of the National Trust for Welfare of Persons with Autism, Cerebral Palsy, Mental Retardation and Multiple Disabilities Act, 1999 (44 of 1999).

Amount of deduction
If the taxpayer incurs any expenditure as mentioned in (a) or (b) above, then a flat deduction of Rs. 75,000 is available, irrespective of the amount of such expenditure. However, if the dependent person is suffering from severe disability (i.e., disability of 80% or above), then the amount of deduction will be Rs. 1,25,000.

Other points to be kept in mind
Following important points should be kept in mind while claiming deduction under section 80DD:

1. The taxpayer should obtain a copy of certificate (Form No. 10-IA) issued by the medical authority (fresh certificate is required in case of reassessment of disability after the expiry of the period mentioned in original certificate).

2. If the dependent predeceases the taxpayer or the member of HUF referred to above, then amount paid or deposited in (b) above, shall be charged to tax in the hands of the taxpayer for the previous year in which such sum is received.

Illustration
Brother of Mr. Raja (a resident) is totally blind and is dependent on Mr. Raja. During the year 2016-17, Mr. Raja has incurred expenditure of Rs. 10,000 on training and rehabilitation of his brother. Can Mr. Raja claim any deduction in respect of expenditure incurred by him on maintenance of his physically handicapped brother?
**

In this case, all the criteria of section 80DD are satisfied and hence, Mr. Raja can claim a flat deduction of Rs. 1,25,000 under section 80DD (since his brother is suffering from 100% disability).
Suppose in the above case, instead of 100% disability, his brother is suffering from disability of less than 80%, then the amount of deduction will be limited to Rs. 75,000.

Deduction in respect of expenditure on medical treatment of specified diseases [Section 80DDB]

As per section 80DDB, a taxpayer can claim deduction in respect of expenditure incurred by him on medical treatment of specified diseases. The provisions in this regard are as follows:

1) Deduction under section 80DDB can be claimed by an individual or a HUF, who is resident in India.

2) Deduction is available in respect of amount actually paid by the taxpayer on medical treatment of specified disease or ailment (prescribed by the Board, see rule 11DD for prescribed disease or ailment).

3) In case of an individual, the aforesaid expenditure should be incurred on medical treatment of an individual or wholly/mainly dependent spouse, children, parents, brothers and sisters of the individual; and

4) In case of a HUF, expenditure should be incurred on the medical treatment of any member of the family, who is wholly/mainly dependent on such HUF.
The tax payer has to obtain the prescription for the medical treatment from a neurologist, an oncologist, a urologist, a haematologist, an immunologist or such other specialist, as may be prescribed.

Amount of deduction

Amount of deduction will be lower of the following:

(a) amount actually paid on medical treatment specified above; or

(b) Rs. 40,000.

However, the limit of Rs. 40,000 will be increased to Rs. 60,000, if the expenditure is incurred on medical treatment of a senior citizen (i.e., any resident individual of age of 60 years or above but less than 80 years and to Rs. 80,000 if the expenditure is incurred on the medical treatment of super senior citizen i.e. resident individual of the age of 80 years or above).

Other points to be kept in mind

Following important points should be kept in mind while claiming deduction under section 80DDB:
  1. The taxpayer should obtain a copy of certificate (Form No. 10-I) issued by a neurologist, an oncologist, a urologist, a haematologist, an immunologist or such other specialist, as may be prescribed, working in a Government hospital.
  1. From the amount of deduction computed in aforesaid manner, amount, if any, received by the taxpayer from any insurer or from his employer, by way of reimbursement for such expenditure shall be deducted.
Illustration

During the financial year 2016-17, Mr. Raja spent Rs. 1,00,000 on medical treatment of specified diseases of his brother (age 48 years) who is wholly dependent on him. He received Rs. 25,000 by way of reimbursement of such expenditure from a medical insurance policy. Can he claim any deduction in respect of expenditure incurred by him on medical treatment of specified diseases?
**

In this case, all the conditions of section 80DDB are satisfied and hence, Mr. Raja can claim deduction under section 80DDB. Deduction under section 80DDB will come to Rs. 15,000 (i.e., Rs. 40,000 maximum limit of deduction – Rs. 25,000 reimbursement from a medical insurance policy). If his brother is a senior citizen (i.e. resident and of the age of 60 years of above but less than 80 years), then the amount of deduction will be Rs. 35,000 (i.e., Rs. 60,000 maximum limit of deduction – Rs. 25,000 reimbursement).

Suppose in above case, the amount received from insurance policy is Rs. 65,000 instead of Rs. 25,000, then the amount of deduction will be NIL (in both the situations), since the amount of reimbursement exceeds the maximum amount of deduction i.e., Rs. 40,000 or Rs. 60,000, as the case may be.

MCQ ON TAX BENEFITS DUE TO LIFE INSURANCE POLICY, HEALTH INSURANCE POLICY AND EXPENDITURE ON MEDICAL TREATMENT

Q1. Taxable Income = Gross Total IncomelessExempt income.
(a) True (b) False

Correct answer : (b) Justification of correct answer :

Taxable Income = Gross Total Income less Deductions under section 80C to 80U.Taxable income is also called total income.
Thus, the statement given in the question is false and hence, option (b) is the correct option.

Q2. Premium on life insurance policy can be claimed as deduction under section 80C.Incase of an individual, deduction is available in respect of policy taken in the name of taxpayer or his/her spouse or his/her children. In case of a HUF, deduction is available in respect of policy taken in the name of karta.

(a) True (b) False

Correct answer : (b) Justification of correct answer :

Premium on life insurance policy can be claimed as deduction under section 80C. In case of an individual, deduction is available in respect of policy taken in the name of taxpayer or his/her spouse or his/her children. In case of a HUF, deduction is available in respect of policy taken in the name of any of the members of the HUF.

Thus, the statement given in the question is false and hence, option (b) is the correct option.

Q3. Overall deduction u/s 80C (along with deduction u/s 80CCC & 80CCD(1)) allowed isup to Rs. _______..
(a)1,00,000 (b) 1,50,000
(c)2,00,000 (d) 2,50,000

Correct answer : (b) Justification of correct answer :

Overall deduction u/s 80C (along with deduction u/s 80CCC & 80CCD(1)) is up to Rs. 1,50,000.
Thus, option (b) is the correct option.

Q4. Deduction under section 80C in respect of life insurance premium is restricted to 20%of capital sum assured in respect of policies issued on or before31-3-2012 and ______% of capital sum assured in case of policies taken on or after 1-4-2012.
(a) 5 (b) 10
(c) 20 (d) 25

Correct answer : (b) Justification of correct answer :

Deduction under section 80C in respect of life insurance premium is restricted to 20% of capital sum assured in respect of policies issued on or before 31-3-2012 and 10% in case of policies issued on or after 1-4-2012. In case of policy taken on or after 1-4-2013 in the name of any person suffering from disability or severe disability referred to in section 80U or suffering from disease or ailment as given in section 80DDB, the limit will be 15% of capital sum assured.
Thus, option (b) is the correct option.

Q5. What is the minimum holding period in respect of life insurance policy whosepremium is claimed as deduction under section 80C?
(a) 2 years (b)3 years
(c) 4 years (d) 5 years

Correct answer : (a) Justification of correct answer :

Following is the minimum holding period in respect of certain investments, deposits, etc., prescribed under section 80C which should be kept in mind while claiming deduction under section 80C:

Nature of Investments/DepositsMinimum Holding Period
ULIP of UTI or LIC 5 years
Life insurance policy 2 years
Senior Citizens Saving Scheme and Post Office Time Deposit 5 years
Thus, option (a) is the correct option.

Q6. Accrued interest on NSC is taxed in the hands of the receiver but will not qualify fordeduction under section 80C.

(a) True (b) False

Correct answer : (b)

Justification of correct answer :
Accrued interest on NSC is taxed in the hands of the receiver and the same will be treated as an investment during the year of accrual (except for last year) and will qualify for deduction under section 80C.
Thus, the statement given in the question is false and hence, option (b) is the correct option.

Q7. The taxpayer can claim deduction under section 80C in respect of amount paid byhim during the year towards tuition fees (excluding development fees, donation or similar payments) paid at the time of admission or thereafter, to any university, school, college or other educational institution situated in India, for full time education of _____children of the taxpayer.
(a)one (b) two
(c) three (d) all

Correct answer : (b) Justification of correct answer :

The taxpayer can claim deduction under section 80C in respect of amount paid by him during the year towards tuition fees (excluding development fees, donation or similar payments) paid at the time of admission or thereafter, to any university, school, college or other educational institution situated in India, for full time education of any two children of the taxpayer.

Thus, option (b) is the correct option.

Q8. The taxpayer can claim deduction under section 80C in respect of amount paid byhim towards interest of housing loan.
(a) True (b) False

Correct answer : (b) Justification of correct answer :
The taxpayer can claim deduction under section 80C in respect of amount paid by him towards repayment (i.e. principal and not interest) of housing loan.
Thus, the statement given in the question is false and hence, option (b) is the correct option.

Q9. The taxpayer (being individual/HUF) can claim deduction under section 80D inrespect of medical insurance premium paid by him in any mode (including cash).
(a) True (b) False

Correct answer : (b) Justification of correct answer :

The taxpayer (being individual/HUF) can claim deduction under section 80D in respect of medical insurance premium paid by him in any mode other than cash. However, payment on account of preventive health check-up can be made in cash.
Thus, the statement given in the question is false and hence, option (b) is the correct option.

Q10. With effect from the assessment year 2013-14, deduction under section 80D isavailable in respect of expenditure up to Rs. _____ incurred by the individual on preventive health check-up of self, his family and parents.
(a) 5,000 (b) 10,000
(c) 15,000 (d) 20,000

Correct answer : (a) Justification of correct answer :

With effect from the assessment year 2013-14, deduction is available in respect of expenditure (up to Rs. 5,000) incurred by the individual on preventive health check-up of self, his family and parents.
Thus, option (a) is the correct option.

[As amended by Finance Act, 2016]

Source: IncomeTaxIndia.gov.in

What are the benefits available to a senior citizen and very senior citizen in respect of tax rates?

$
0
0
What are the benefits available to a senior citizen and very senior citizen in respect of tax rates?

Senior citizens and a very senior citizen are granted a higher exemption limit as compared to normal tax payers. Exemption limit is the quantum of income up to which a person is not liable to pay tax. The exemption limit granted to senior citizen and very senior citizen for the financial year 2016-17 is as follows :

Senior citizen
Very senior citizen
A senior citizen is granted a higher exemption limit compared to non-senior citizens. The exemption limit for the financial year 2016-17 available to a resident senior citizen is Rs. 3,00,000. In other words, a resident senior citizen is not liable to pay any tax up to income of Rs. 3,00,000. The exemption limit for non-senior citizen is Rs. 2,50,000. Thus, it can be observed that an additional benefit of Rs. 50,000 in the form of higher exemption limit is available to a resident senior citizen as compared to normal tax payers. A very senior citizen is granted a higher exemption limit compared to others. The exemption limit for the financial year 2016-17 available to a resident very senior citizen is Rs. 5,00,000. In other words, a resident very senior citizen is not liable to pay any tax up to income of Rs. 5,00,000. The exemption limit for non-senior citizen is Rs. 2,50,000. Thus, it can be observed that an additional benefit of Rs. 2,50,000 in the form of higher exemption limit is available to a resident very senior citizen as compared to normal tax payers.

[post_ads]

At what age a person will qualify as a senior citizen and very senior citizen under the Income-tax Law?

Before understanding the age criteria, it is very important to know that the tax benefits offered under the Income-tax Law to a senior citizen/very senior citizen are available only to resident senior citizen and resident very senior citizens. In other words, these benefits are not available to a non-resident even though he may be of higher age. The age and other criteria to qualify as a senior citizen and very senior citizen under the Income-tax Law are as follows :

Criteria for senior citizen
Criteria for very senior citizen
Must be of the age of 60 years or above but less than 80 year at any time during the respective year. Must be of the age of 80 years or above at any time during the respective year.
Must be resident Must be resident
Illustration
Illustration
(1) Mr. Kumar (resident in India) attained the age of 60 years during the financial year 2016-17. Will he qualify as senior citizen under the Income-tax Law for the financial year 2016-17?
**
Yes, since Mr. Kumar is a resident and he attained the age of 60 years during the year 2016-17, he will be treated as senior citizen under the Income-tax Law for the financial year 2016-17.

(2) Mr. Kamal (non-resident) attained the age of 60 years during the financial year 2016-17. Will he qualify as senior citizen under the Income-tax Law for the financial year 2016-17?
**
Mr. Kamal is a non-resident, the benefits of senior citizen under the Income-tax Law are available to a resident only, and hence, Mr. Kamal will not be treated as senior citizen under the Income-tax Law for the financial year 2016-17.
(1) Mr. Raja (resident in India) attained the age of 80 years during the financial year 2016-17. Will he qualify as very senior citizen under the Income-tax Law for the financial year 2016-17?
**
Yes, since Mr. Raja is a resident and he attained the age of 80 years during the year 2016-17, he will be treated as a very senior citizen under the Income-tax Law for the financial year 2016-17.

(2) Mr.Rajat (non-resident in India) attained the age of 80 years during the financial year 2016-17. Will he qualify as very senior citizen under the Income-tax Law for the financial year 2016-17?
**
Mr.Rajat is a non-resident, the benefits of very senior citizen under the Income-tax Law are available to a resident only and, hence, Mr.Rajat will not be treated as very senior citizen under the Income-tax Law for the financial year 2016-17.

Is there any special benefit available under the Income-tax law to very high aged person, i.e., very senior citizens?
Yes, the Income-tax Law very well takes care of very senior citizens of the nation by offering special tax benefits to high aged person (80 year or above).

[post_ads_2]

Is there any special benefit available under the Income-tax law to senior citizens?
Yes, the Income-tax Law very well takes care of the senior citizens of the nation by offering them several tax benefits.In this part you can gain knowledge of various benefits offered by the Income-tax Law to senior citizens.

Is a very senior citizen granted exemption from e-filing of income tax return?
From the assessment year 2015-16 onwards any taxpayer filing return of income in Form ITR 1/2/2A and having a refund claim in the return or having total income of more than Rs. 5,00,000 is required to furnish the return of income electronically with or without digital signature or by using electronic verification code. However, Income-tax Law grants relaxation from e-filing in above case to very senior citizen.
In other words, a very senior citizen filing his return of income in Form ITR 1/2/2A and having total income of more than Rs. 5,00,000 or having a refund claim can file his return of income in paper mode, i.e., for him e filing of ITR 1/2/2A (as the case may be) is not mandatory. However, he may go for e-filing if he wishes.

Is a retired senior citizen granted exemption from payment of advance tax?
As per section 208, every person whose estimated tax liability for the year is Rs. 10,000 or more, shall pay his tax in advance, in the form of "advance tax". However, section 208 gives relief from payment of advance tax to a retired senior citizen. As per section 208 a resident senior citizen (i.e., an individual of the age of 60 years or above during the relevant financial year) not having any income from business or profession, is not liable to pay advance tax.

What are the benefits available in respect of expenditure incurred on account of medical treatment of specified diseases on treatment of a senior citizen or a very senior citizen?
section 80DDB of the Income-tax Law gives various provisions relating to tax benefits available on account of expenditure on medical treatment of specified diseases. Click the following link to know about details of section 80DDB which covers the details of special benefits under section 80DDB available to a senior citizen or very senior citizen. Check page 8 topic "Deduction in respect of expenditure on medical treatment of specified diseases [ section 80DDB]"

What are the benefits available in respect of expenditure incurred on account of medical insurance premium/ medical expenditure to a senior citizen/very senior citizen and on account of?
Section 80D of the Income-tax Law gives various provisions relating to tax benefits available on account of payment of medical insurance premium and other related items. Click the following link to know about details of section 80D which covers the details of special benefits under section 80D available to a senior citizen and very senior citizen.. Check page 5 topic "Deduction in respect of medical insurance premium [ Section 80D]"

KVS Pensioners Identity Card: Application Form

$
0
0
KVS Pensioners Identity Card: Application Form
KENDRIYA VIDYALAYA SANGATHAN
केन्‍द्रीय विद्यालय संगठन
18 INSTITUTIONAL AREA
१८ इन्स्टीटूशनल एरिया
SHAHEED JEET SINGH MARG
शहीद जीत सिंह मार्ग
NEW DELHI-110016.
नई दिल्ली - ११००१६


[post_ads]

PENSIONER’S IDENTITY CARD
पेंशनर पहचान पत्र

No.:_________________________
Name :_________________________
Address:_________________________

_________________________
Telephone No.:_________________________
Blood Group:_________________________

Signature
Authority with Seal
Signature of Card Holder
Date of birth  ____________________________

Date of Superannuation /Retirement____________________________

Pay-Scale on Retirement____________________________

Post held on Retirement____________________________

Last Pay____________________________

P.P.O No. and date____________________________

Aadhaar No. (if available)____________________________

[Download Form ##download##]

Voluntary Retirement: AIS (Death-cum-retirement-benefits) Amendment Rules - Notification

$
0
0
Voluntary Retirement: AIS (Death-cum-retirement-benefits) Amendment Rules: Notification dated 27.02.2017

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : EXTRAORDINARY [PART II-SBC. 3(i)]

MINISTRY OF PERSONNEL, PUBLIC GRIEVANCES AND PENSIONS
(Department of Personnel and Training)

NOTIFICATION

New Delhi, the 27th February, 2017

G.S.R. 170(E).-In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) read with sub-section (IA) of section 3 of the All India Services Act, 1951 (61 of 1951), the central Government, after consultation with the Governments of the States concerned, herby makes the following rules, further to amend the All India Services (Death-Cum-Retirement-Benefits) Rules, 1958, namely:-

[post_ads]

1 (1) These rules may be called the All India Services (Death-Cum-Retirement-Benefits) Amendment Rules, 2017.
(2) They shall be deemed to have come into force from the date of their publication in the official Gazette.

2. In the All India Services (Death-Cum-Retirement-Benefits) Rules, 1958 in rule 16, after sub-rule (2A), the following sub-rules shall be inserted, namely :-

“(2B) (a) The notice of voluntary retirement given in writing by the member of the service under sub-rule (2) and (2A), may be withdrawn by the member of service.
(b) Request for withdrawal of notice of voluntary retirement shall be submitted to the Competent Authority within the period specified in the said notice.

(2C) Where a notice of voluntary retirement is given by a member of service under sub-rule (2) and the competent authority does not issue any order before the expiry of the period. specified in the said notice, the voluntary retirement shall become effective from the date of expiry of the said period.

Provided that, where no order is issued by the competent authority, then after the expiry of the period
specified in the notice, the Central Government may issue orders.

(2D) For the purpose of this rule the expression ‘competent authority’ shall mean the authority which is empowered to accept notice of voluntary retirement under sub-rules (2) and (2A).”.

[R No. 24012/04/20]6.AIS-H(Pension)]

KAVITHA V. PADMANABHAN, Dy. Secy. (8&V)
[post_ads_2]

NFU for the armed forces: Centre to contest tribunal order on military pay

$
0
0
Centre to contest tribunal order on military pay: The Hindu

Says it has no authority and the ruling is ‘judicial overreach’

The Defence Ministry has decided as a matter of principle to challenge in the Supreme Court the ruling of the Armed Forces Tribunal to grant non-functional upgrade (NFU) for the armed forces.

While the government is not against the upgrade for the services, its challenge is on principle as a tribunal has no authority to take such a decision. It is “judicial overreach”, a senior Ministry official said.

[post_ads]

Core anomalies

Last December, the Principal Bench of the tribunal in New Delhi granted the upgrade to the armed forces personnel in pay and allowances in response to a petition filed by over 160 officers. The upgrade has been one of the core anomalies raised by the services in the Seventh Pay Commission recommendations, which are yet to be implemented for them.

The official said the Defence Ministry had been open to granting the upgrade to the services and it was being looked into as part of the four core anomalies raised by them.

“The Ministry is waiting for the elections to get over. They will appeal later this month,” another official said.

The upgrade entitles all officers of a batch who are not promoted to draw the salary and grade pay that the senior-most officer of their batch would get after a certain period. For instance, batch mates of a Secretary to the Government of India who have not been promoted will be entitled to the same pay after a certain time lapse.

The Sixth Pay Commission had granted the upgrade to most Group ‘A’ officers but not the military. Since then, the armed forces had been demanding a one-time notional upgrade to ensure parity.

However, the Seventh Pay Commission (SPC) gave a mixed verdict on it and the issue has since been referred to the Anomalies Committee. A decision is expected by March-end, sources said.

[post_ads_2]

Read at: The Hindu

UGC Pay Review Committee Recommends scrapping ad-hoc, temporary appointments of teachers

$
0
0
UGC panel recommends scrapping ad-hoc, temporary appointments of teachers: Hindustan Times

MAJOR RECOMMENDATIONS
  • Teachers to be given pay and allowances in accordance with the Seventh Pay commission recommendation.
  • Higher educational institutions cannot stay without leadership at any point in time.
  • Top 1% of NET qualifiers to be posted as assistant professors.
  • Introduction of vice-principal “Grade 1 or II Principal” depending upon the size of the college.
  • Qualified individuals to be able to make direct entry at both associate and professor levels.
  • Setting up an educational tribunal to deal with grievances related to higher educational institutions.
  • Any college seeking funds from central/state government/UGC to have NAAC accreditation of minimum grade B.

[post_ads]
A panel set up by the University Grants Commission (UGC) has recommended scrapping ad-hoc and temporary appointments of teachers across universities.

UGC’s pay review committee, which was formed last year and is headed by UGC member VS Chauhan, has also suggested that pay of teachers should be in accordance with the seventh central pay commission, which means the overall salary of teachers would also go up if the suggestion is accepted by the human resource development (HRD) ministry.

The recommendation is good news for aspiring professors as central universities may have to appoint over 6,000 teachers.

Of the total 17,006 teaching posts in various UGC-funded central universities, 6,080 were lying vacant on October 1, 2016, according to official data. This includes 911 vacancies in University of Delhi (DU).

Welcoming UGC’s recommendation, senior professor and PRO of Allahabad University (AU) Yogeshwar Tiwari said discontinuing temporary postings would help the university fill vacant posts. AU currently has 525 vacant posts.

Appointment of permanent lecturers is also likely to improve teaching standards as ad-hoc professors usually keep switching colleges because of which there is a gap in the assessment of a student’s academic progression. “Certain subjects are not taught due to lack of specialist faculty at times. In many cases, existing teachers are burdened with additional work...” said a DU professor.

The committee, has also suggested linking grants to universities to the vacant posts filled by them.

[post_ads]

7th Pay Commission higher allowances from April 1: Zee News

$
0
0
7th Pay Commission: Central govt employees to get higher allowances from April 1
7th-cpc-allowance-latest-news

New Delhi: In a good fiscal start for the Central government employees, media reports say that they will get higher allowances according as has been recommended by the 7th Pay Commission recommendations from April 1.

Earlier, media reports had said that the report on higher allowance was to be submitted on February 20, however that deadline was missed. The latest news reports now say that government will soon complete the process to release higher allowance.

The Union Cabinet on June 29 cleared the recommendations of the 7th Pay Commission headed by AK Mathur in respect of the hike in basic pay and pension. However, the decision on 7th Pay Commission suggestions relating to allowances has been referred to a Committee headed by the Finance Secretary.

The 7th Central Pay Commission (CPC) had recommended HRA at the rates initially from 24%, 16%, and 8 % and whenever DA reaches 50% it will be increased to 27%, 18% and 9%, The panel also said that s and when the DA reaches 100% the HRA will be revised to 30% , 20% and 10% for X,Y and Z cities respectively .

The pay commission also recommended doing away with 53 of the 196 allowances and merging a few others.

It is also reported that the committee has proposed to abolish 52 allowances, and subsume 36 allowances into existing allowances or proposed as new one. 12 Allowances are reported to have been proposed to be retained without changes, while the rest of the allowances have been tweaked little.

Read at: Zee News

निजी कॉलेजों में 7वां वेतन आयोग जल्द

$
0
0
निजी कॉलेजों में 7वां वेतन आयोग जल्द

नई दिल्ली: मदन जैड़ा
निजी क्षेत्र के पेशेवर कॉलेजों के शिक्षकों को भी सातवें वेतन आयोग की सिफारिशों का लाभ मिलेगा। अखिल भारतीय तकनीकी शिक्षा परिषद (एआईसीटीई) ने इसके लिए आवश्यक तैयारियां शुरू कर दी है। इसके लिए एक विशेषज्ञ समिति बनाई गई है, जो पेशेवर कॉलेजों में सातवें वेतन आयोग के क्रियान्वयन के लिए तौर-तरीके निर्धारित करेगी। 

इसलिए उठाना पड़ा कदम : वेतन आयोग की सिफारिशें वैसे तो केंद्र सरकार के कार्मिकों के लिए होती हैं। लेकिन जब सरकारी कॉलेजों, विश्वविद्यालयों में सातवें वेतन आयोग का क्रियान्वयन होता है, तो निजी कॉलेजों के शिक्षकों का वेतन कम रह जाता है। यह स्थिति शिक्षकों की गुणवत्ता को प्रभावित करती है। इसलिए एआईसीटीई ने फैसला किया है कि उसके अधीन आने वाले सभी पेशेवर कॉलेजों को सातवें वेतन आयोग की सिफारिशें लागू करनी होंगी। 
[post_ads]

चार महीने में रिपोर्ट :विश्वसरैय्या तकनीकी विश्वविद्यालय के कुलपति एस. राजशेखरैय्या की अध्यक्षता में यह समिति बनाई गई है। समिति चार महीने के भीतर अपनी रिपोर्ट एआईसीटीई को सौंपेगी, जिसका अध्ययन करने के बाद इसे लागू किया जाएगा।

7th-cpc-news-private-colleges

श्रोत- हिन्दुस्तान 2017-3-6
[post_ads_2]
Viewing all 11682 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>