Quantcast
Channel: Central Govt Employees News – 8th Pay Commission – Staff News
Viewing all 11682 articles
Browse latest View live

7th CPC: Revision of Entitlement of TA/DA to JCM Members

$
0
0
Revision of Entitlement of TA/DA to JCM Members after implementation of Seventh CPC recommendations 

F. No. 8/10/2008-JCA 
Government of India Ministry of Personnel, P.G. & Pensions 
Department of Personnel & Training 
Establishment (JCA) Section 

North Block, New Delhi 
Dated 20th August, 2018 

OFFICE MEMORANDUM 

Subject: Revision of Entitlement of TA/DA to JCM Members after implementation of Seventh CPC recommendations.

The undersigned is directed to say that consequent upon the revision of rates of Travelling Allowance/Daily Allowance by the Department of Expenditure vide O.M. No. 19030/1/2017-E.IV dated 13/07/2017, the Staff Side Members of the National Council (NC)/Departmental Councils and Third Level/Regional Councils of JCM shall be entitled to TA/DA etc. in the following manner w.e.f. 01.07.2017. 
[post_ads]
A. National/Departmental Council JCM 
TA/DA entitlement as admissible to officers in Pay level 12 & 13 as per Department of Expenditure’s O.M. No. 19030 /1/2017-E.IV dated 13/07/2017 as under: 

(i) Travel entitlement within the country – Economy class by Air or AC-I Class by Train including travel in Premium /Premium Tatkal /Suvidha/Shatabdi / Rajdhani Trains. 

(ii) Reimbursement for Hotel Accommodation of upto Rs. 4500/- per day. 

(iii) Reimbursement of food bills not exceeding Rs.1000/- per day. 

(iv) Reimbursement of AC Taxi Charges of upto 50 kms per day. 

B. Regional/ Office Council (JCM) 
TA/DA entitlement as admissible to officers in Pay level 11 as per Department of Expenditure’s O.M. No. 19030 /1/2017-E.IV dated 13/07/2017 as under : 

(i) Travel entitlement within the country – Economy Class by Air or AC-II Class including Rajdhani/ Shatabdi Express etc. 

(ii) 
Reimbursement for Hotel Accommodation of upto Rs. 2250/- per day. 

(iii) Reimbursement of food bills not exceeding Rs. 900/- per day. 

(iv) Reimbursement of non-AC taxi charges of up-to Rs. 338/- per day for travel within the city 
    [post_ads_2]
    2. The admissibility of DA in case of free boarding and lodging, has been considered in Department of Expenditure. Daily Allowance is given to the Govt. employees as a reimbursement of the expenditure incurred by him on tour for his stay, food and travel at that station. In case of free boarding and lodging, the Govt. employee, if incurring any expenditure on local travel, can claim the same as per Para 2 E(i) and (iii) of the Annexure to OM No.19030/1/2017 E.IV dated 13.07.2017. The earlier system of giving 25% of DA has been discontinued. Also after implementation of 7th CPC recommendations, the facility of DA at 5th CPC rates is done away with. 

    3. This O.M. is issued with concurrence of the Ministry of Finance, Department of Expenditure vide I.D. No.300377130/2018-E.IV dated 31.07.2018 

    (Juglal Singh) 
    Deputy Secretary to the Government of India 

    7th-cpc-ta-da-for-jcm-staff-side-members-dopt-order

    [http://documents.doptcirculars.nic.in/D2/D02est/TA%20DA%20%20for%20JCM%20Staff%20Side3eVV4.pdf]

    7th CPC - Classification of Posts as pay level matrix specified in CCS(RP Rules) - Gazette Notification

    $
    0
    0
    7th CPC - Classification of Posts as pay level matrix specified in CCS(RP Rules) - Gazette Notification

    MINISTRY OF PERSONNEL, PUBLIC GRIEVANCES AND PENSIONS 
    (Department of Personnel and Training) 

    ORDER 
    New Delhi, the 9th August, 2018

    S.O. 3964(F).—In exercise of the powers conferred by the proviso to article 309 of the Constitution read with rule 6 of the Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965 and in supersession of the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions (Department of Personnel and Training) number S.O. 3570(E), dated the 9th November, 2017, and after consultation with the Comptroller and Auditor General of India in relation to person serving in the Indian Audit and Accounts Department, except as respects things done or omitted to be done before such supersession, the President hereby directs that with effect from the date of publication of this Order in the Official Gazette, all civil posts under the Union, shall be classified as follows, 
    [post_ads]
    S.No.Description of PostsClassification of posts
    (1)(2)(3)
    1.A Central Civil Post carrying the pay in the Pay Matrix at the Level from 10 to 18.Group A
    2.A Central Civil Post carrying the pay in the Pay Matrix at the Level from 6 to 9.Group B
    3.A Central Civil Post carrying the pay in the Pay Matrix at the Level from I to 5.Group C

    Explanation.—For the purpose of this Order, ‘Level’ in relation to a post means, the Level specified in third row of Part A of the Schedule to the Central Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 2016. 
    [post_ads_2]
    [F. No. 11012/10/2016-Estt.A-III]  

    GYANENDRA DEV TRIPATHI, 
    Jt. Secy. 
    classification-of-post-gazette-notification-dopt.png

    Source: Click here to view/download the PDF
    [http://egazette.nic.in/WriteReadData/2018/188480.pdf]

    7th CPC and OROP: Revision of Casualty Pensionary Awards in respect of Pre-2006 Armed Forces Officer and JCOs/ORs pensioners - Clarification

    $
    0
    0
    7th CPC and OROP: Revision of Casualty Pensionary Awards in respect of Pre-2006 Armed Forces Officer and JCOs/ORs pensioners - Clarification 

    OFFICE OF THE PR. CONTROLLER OF DEFENCE ACCOUNTS (PENSIONS) 
    DRAUPADI GHAT, ALLAHABAD- 211014 

    Circular No. 604 
    Dated: 16.08.2018 
    To, 

    1. The Chief Accountant, RBI, Deptt. Of Govt. Bank Accounts, Central office C-7, Second Floor, Bandre- Kuria Complex, P B No 8143, Bandre East Mumbai- 400051 
    2. All CMDs, Public Sector Banks including IDBI Bank 
    3. Nodal Officers, ICICl/ HDFC/ AXIS/ IDBI Banks 
    4. Managers, All CPPCs 
    5. Military and Air Attache, Indian Embassy, Kathmandu, Nepal 
    6. The PCDA (WC), Chandigarh 
    7. The CDA (PD), Meerut 
    8. The CDA, Chennai 
    9. The Director of Treasuries, All States 
    10. The Pay and Accounts Officer, Delhi Administration, RK Puram and Tis Hazari, New Delhi 
    11. The Pay and Accounts Office, Govt of Maharashtra, Mumbai 
    12. The Post Master Kathua (J&K) 
    13. The Post Master Camp Bell Bay 
    14. The Pr. Pay and Accounts Officer, Andaman and Nicobar Administration, Port Blair 
    Sub:- Revision of Casualty Pensionary Awards in respect of Pre-2006 Armed Forces Officer and JCOs/Ors pensioners: Clarification. 

    Ref:- This office Circular No. 569 dated 19.10.2016. 

    ********* 

    There are several representations from various War Veteran Associations demanding the benefit of Maximum of Term of Engagement in OROP as well as in 7th CPC revision quoting the Para-3 of Circular No. 569 dated 19.10.2016. Thus, it appears that there are some misinterpretation /confusion about Para-3 of Circular No. 569 dated 19.10.2016, which needs to be clarified in this regard. 
    [post_ads]
    Earlier vide Annexure No.-II of MoD letter No. 200847/Pen-C/71 dated 24.02.1972, there was a provision that Service Element of War Injury Pension will be equal in amount to the normal retiring pension of the rank held at the time of disablement for maximum service of rank. It means Service Element of War Injury Pension was admissible for maximum term of engagement subject to restriction that War Injury Pension should not be more than last pay drawn. Prior to 6th CPC the Service Element/ Service Pension was given 50% of the reckonable emoluments for 33 years of Qualifying Service including weightage, and for lesser period it was proportionately reduced. It is pertinent to mention that after evolution of 6th CPC provision concept of pro-rata reduction has been dispensed with. As per 6th CPC orders pension will be 50% of the last pay drawn irrespective of Qualifying Service. Therefore, relevance of Maximum Term of Engagement becomes obsolete. 

    The minimum guaranteed pension after implementation of 6th Central Pay Commission, was initially determined on the basis of minimum of the Pay in Pay Band plus Grade Pay vide MoD letter dated 11.11.2008 (Circular No. 397 of this office). This was further modified with issue of MoD letter No. 1(04)/ 2015 / (1)-D (Pen/ Pol) dated 03.09 .2015 for revision of Service Pension/ Service Element in respect of Pre-2006 Commissioned Officers/JCOs/ORs pensioners on the basis of minimum of fitment table for the Rank in the revised Pay Band as indicated under fitment tables, and accordingly Circular No. 547 and 548 has been issued for PBORs and Commissioned Officers respectively. The ibid minimum guaranteed pension was calculated as 50% of minimum of fitment table for 33 years of Qualifying Service including weightage with pro-rata reduction for lesser period. 

    The minimum guaranteed disability element/war injury element was not covered in the ibid MoD letter dated 03.09.2015. Therefore, .MoD letter No. 16(01)/2014/ D(Pen/ Pol) dated 18.05.2016 was issued (Circular No. 560) for revision of Casualty Pensionary awards in respect of Pre-2006 Armed Forces Officers and JCO/ORs Pensioners/ Family Pensioners, which provides for minimum guaranteed Disability Element/War Injury Element. The clause of pension upto Maximum Term of Engagement in case of War Disabled Pensioners which was admissible prior to 6th CPC was omitted in both the above circulars of minimum guaranteed pension. Therefore, there was a need to clarify this issue and hence the Para-3 has been inserted in Circular No. 569 dated 19.10.2016. After issue of GOI MoD letter No. 1(2)/2016-D(Pen/Pol) dated 30.09.2016 for delinking of qualifying service of 33 years for revision of pension under minimum guaranteed pension, Para No, 3 of Circular No. 569 has become redundant and therefore this Para-3 may be treated as deleted. 
    [post_ads_2]
    After implementation of 6th CPC and subsequently also in 7th CPC, pension will be determined on the basis of 50% of last pay drawn irrespective of Qualifying Service, so the relevance of pro-rata reduction for lesser qualifying service become redundant as full pension is admissible for each qualifying service in each rank. Therefore, pension upto term of engagement has also become redundant. Further, the pension as per OROP rates was based on the live data of 2013 retirees where pension was given as per 6th CPC provisions. Therefore, the demand of pension upto term of engagement has also become obsolete. 

    Therefore, it is requested that the issue may be dealt with accordingly and the pensioner approaching for this may be clarified on similar lines duly stating that pension upto term of engagement in case of war disabled pensioners in OROP as well as 7th CPC revision is irrelevant. 

    This circular has been uploaded on official website of this office www. pcdapension.nic.in 

    No. Gts/Tech/05/LXXX 
    Dated: 16.08.2018 

    (Sushil Kumar Singh) 
    Jt. CDA(P) 

    [http://pcdapension.nic.in/pcdapension/6cpc/Circular-604.pdf]

    Supreme Court Judgement - Casual Labour Regularisation: Applicable to those Appointed after 1993 & 2006 who completed 10 years service

    $
    0
    0
    Supreme Court Judgement - Casual Labour Regularisation: Applicable to those Appointed after 1993 & 2006 who completed 10 years service

    REPORTABLE 
    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA 
    CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION 
    CIVIL APPEAL NOS.7423-7429 OF 2018 
    (Arising out of S.L.P. (Civil) Nos. 19832-19838 OF 2017)
    Narendra Kumar Tiwari & Ors. Etc. ….Appellants 

    versus 

    The State of Jharkhand & Ors. Etc. ….Respondents 

    JUDGMENT 

    Madan B. Lokur, J. 

    1. Leave granted

    2. These appeals arise out of the common judgment and order dated 17th November, 2016 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court of Jharkhand in a batch of writ petitions relating to the regularisation of daily wage or contract workers on different posts. The writ petitioners (now appellants) were denied the benefit of regularisation in view of the provisions of the Jharkhand Sarkar ke Adhinasth Aniyamit Rup se Niyukt Ewam Karyarat Karmiyo ki Sewa Niyamitikaran Niyamawali, 2015 (hereinafter referred to as the Regularisation Rules). 
    [post_ads]
    3. The admitted position is that the appellants are irregularly appointed employees of the State Government. They sought regularisation of their status on the ground that they had put in more than 10 years of service and were therefore entitled to be regularised. The High Court took the view that the decision of the Constitution Bench of this Court in Secretary, State of Karnataka and Ors. v. Umadevi (3) and Ors.1 did not permit their regularisation since they had not worked for 10 years on the cut-off date of 10th April, 2006 when the Constitution Bench rendered its decision. According to the High Court, the Regularisation Rules provided a one-time measure of regularisation of the services of irregularly appointed employees based on the cut-off date of 10th April,2006 in terms of the judgment of the Constitution Bench. Therefore, since the appellants had not put in 10 years of service they could not be regularised. 

    4. The appellants had contended before the High Court that the State of Jharkhand was created only on 15th November, 2000 and therefore no one could have completed 10 years of service with the State of Jharkhand on the cut-off date of 10th April, 2006. Therefore, no one could get the benefit of the Regularisation Rules which made the entire legislative exercise totally meaningless. The appellants had pointed out in the High Court that the State had issued Resolutions on 18th July, 2009 and 19th July, 2009 permitting the regularisation of some employees of the State, who had obviously not put in 10 years of service with the State.Consequently, it was submitted that the appellants were discriminated against for no fault of theirs and in an irrational manner.

    5. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and having considered the decision of the Constitution Bench in Umadevi (3) as well as the subsequent decision of this Court explaining Umadevi (3) in State of Karnataka and Ors. v. M.L. Kesari and Ors.2, we are of the view that the High Court has erred in taking an impractical view of the directions in Umadevi (3) as well as its consideration in Kesari. 

    6. The decision in Umadevi (3) was intended to put a full stop to the somewhat pernicious practice of irregularly or illegally appointing daily wage workers and continuing with them indefinitely. In fact, in paragraph 49 of the Report, it was pointed out that the rule of law requires appointments to be made in a constitutional manner and the State cannot be permitted to perpetuate an irregularity in the matter of public employment which would adversely affect those who could be employed in terms of the constitutional scheme. It is for this reason that the concept of a one-time measure and a cut-off date was introduced in the hope and expectation that the State would cease and desist from making irregular or illegal appointments and instead make appointments on a regular basis.
    [post_ads_2]
    7. The concept of a one-time measure was further explained in Kesari in paragraphs 9, 10 and 11 of the Report which read as follows: 

    “9. The term “one-time measure” has to be understood in its proper perspective. This would normally mean that after the decision in Umadevi (3), each department or each instrumentality should undertake a one-time exercise and prepare a list of all casual, daily-wage or ad hoc employees who have been working for more than ten years without the intervention of courts and tribunals and subject them to a process verification as to whether they are working against vacant posts and possess the requisite qualification for the post and if so, regularise their services. 

    10. At the end of six months from the date of decision in Umadevi (3), cases of several daily-wage/ad hoc/casual employees were still pending before courts. Consequently, several departments and instrumentalities did not commence the one-time regularisation process. On the other hand, some government departments or instrumentalities undertook the onetime exercise excluding several employees from consideration either on the ground that their cases were pending in courts or due to sheer oversight. In such circumstances, the employees who were entitled to be considered in terms of para 53 of the decision in Umadevi (3), will not lose their right to be considered for regularisation, merely because the one-time exercise was completed without considering their cases, or because the sixmonth period mentioned in para 53 of Umadevi (3) has expired. The one-time exercise should consider all daily-wage/ad hoc/casual employees who had put in 10 years of continuous service as on 10-4-2006 without availing the protection of any interim orders of courts or tribunals. If any employer had held the one-time exercise in terms of para 53 of Umadevi (3), but did not consider the cases of some employees who were entitled to the benefit of para 53 of Umadevi (3), the employer concerned should consider their cases also, as a continuation of the one-time exercise. The one-time exercise will be concluded only when all the employees who are entitled to be considered in terms of para 53 of Umadevi (3), are so considered.

    11. The object behind the said direction in para 53 of Umadevi (3) is twofold. First is to ensure that those who have put in more than ten years of continuous service without the protection of any interim orders of courts or tribunals, before the date of decision in Umadevi (3) was rendered, are considered for regularisation in view of their long service. Second is to ensure that the departments/instrumentalities do not perpetuate the practice of employing persons on daily-wage/ad hoc/casual basis for long periods and then periodically regularise them on the ground that they have served for more than ten years, thereby defeating the constitutional or statutory provisions relating to recruitment and appointment. The true effect of the direction is that all persons who have worked for more than ten years as on 10-4-2006 [the date of decision in Umadevi (3)] without the protection of any interim order of any court or tribunal, in vacant posts, possessing the requisite qualification, are entitled to be considered for regularisation. The fact that the employer has not undertaken such exercise of regularisation within six months of the decision

    in Umadevi (3) or that such exercise was undertaken only in regard to a limited few, will not disentitle such employees, the right to be considered for regularisation in terms of the above directions in Umadevi (3) as a one-time measure.” 

    8. The purpose and intent of the decision in Umadevi (3) was therefore two-fold, namely, to prevent irregular or illegal appointments in the future and secondly, to confer a benefit on those who had been irregularly appointed in the past. The fact that the State of Jharkhand continued with the irregular appointments for almost a decade after the decision in Umadevi (3) is a clear indication that it believes that it was all right to continue with irregular appointments, and whenever required, terminate the services of the irregularly appointed employees on the

    ground that they were irregularly appointed. This is nothing but a form of exploitation of the employees by not giving them the benefits of regularisation and by placing the sword of Damocles over their head. This is precisely what Umadevi (3) and Kesari sought to avoid. 

    9. If a strict and literal interpretation, forgetting the spirit of the decision of the Constitution Bench in Umadevi (3), is to be taken into consideration then no irregularly appointed employee of the State of Jharkhand could ever be regularised since that State came into existence only on 15th November, 2000 and the cut-off date was fixed as 10th April,2006. In other words, in this manner the pernicious practice of indefinitely continuing irregularly appointed employees would be perpetuated contrary to the intent of the Constitution Bench. 

    10. The High Court as well as the State of Jharkhand ought to have considered the entire issue in a contextual perspective and not only from the point of view of the interest of the State, financial or otherwise – the interest of the employees is also required to be kept in mind. What has eventually been achieved by the State of Jharkhand is to short circuit the process of regular appointments and instead make appointments on an irregular basis. This is hardly good governance. 

    11. Under the circumstances, we are of the view that the Regularisation Rules must be given a pragmatic interpretation and the appellants, if they have completed 10 years of service on the date of promulgation of the Regularisation Rules, ought to be given the benefit of the service rendered by them. If they have completed 10 years of service they should be regularised unless there is some valid objection to their regularisation like misconduct etc. 

    12. The impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court is set aside in view of our conclusions. The State should take a decision within four months from today on regularisation of the status of the appellants. 

    13. The appeals are accordingly disposed of. 

    14. We may add that that it would be worthwhile for the State of Jharkhand to henceforth consider making regular appointments only and dropping the idea of making irregular appointments so as to short circuit the process of regular appointments. 

    ………………………J. 
    (Madan B. Lokur) 

    .……………………..J. 
    (Deepak Gupta) 

    New Delhi: 
    August 01,2018 

    Benefits of MACPs w.e.f. 1.1.2006 - Supreme Court Judgment - Representation to DOP&T

    $
    0
    0
    Benefits of MACPs w.e.f. 1.1.2006 - Supreme Court Judgment

    Grant of financial upgradation under ACP & MACP schemes for the central Government Civilian Employees including Railway employees

    NFIR
    No. IV/MACPs/09/part II
    Dated: 21/08/2018

    The Secretary / DoP&T
    (Department of personnel PG & pension),
    Department of personnel & Training,
    North Block,
    New Delhi.

    Dear Sir,

    Sub: Grant of financial upgradation under ACP & MACP schemes for the central Government Civilian Employees including Railway employees – reg.

    Ref: (i)  Dop&T oM No.35034/1/97-Estt (D) dated 09/08/1999.
    (ii) Dop&T oM No.35034/3/2008-Estt (D) dated 19/05/2009.

    NFIR invites kind attention to the OM dated 09/08/1999 wherein the Government of India (DoP&T) had introduced ‘Assured career Progression Scheme‘ (ACPs) for the central Government civilian Employees pursuant to the recommendation of 5th central pay commission. The ACP Scheme was made effective in the Central Government departments from 1999. The ACP Scheme remained functional until 31/08/2008 (as clarified by the DoP&T vide para 9 its OM dated 19/05/2009) due to the fact that the ‘Modified Assured Carrer Progression Scheme‘ was introduced by the DoP&T, replacing ACPS w.e.f. 01/09/2008, pursuant to the recommendations of 6th CPC.
    [post_ads]
    The Federation has however been receiving representations from the Central Government civilian Employees, mainly railway employees from all corners of the country to make the MACP Scheme operational w.e.f. 01/01/2006 instead from 01/09/2008, pursuant to the order dated 08th December, 2017 passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal Diary No.3744 of 2016. In this connection, NFIR places following facts for consideration:-
    • on perusal of the order of the Apex court, it is found that the Hon’ble Apex court has held that the MACP is a part of pay structure recommended by the 6th CPC, the same cannot be considerd as allowance which had been given effect from 01/09/2008. The said order has also cited the Resolution dated 30/08/2008 of the Government which was referred in the notification issued by the Ministry of Finance wherein MACP has been defined part of ‘Pay structure‘ and not as ‘Allowance‘ and therefore should be given effect from 01/01/2006.
    • The order dated 8th Dec 2017 passed by the Apex court has already been implemented by the Ministry of Defence, giving effect to the MACPs w.e.f.01/01/2006 through an OM dated 25/07/2018.
    • DoP&T may kindly take note that in para 6.5.2 & 6.5.4 of the report of 6th CPC, the Commission had recommended for implementation of the revised pay structure consisting of Pay Band and Grade Pay w.e.f. 01/01/2006 while the revised allowances were given effect from prospective date i.e. 01/09/2008.
    • Ministry of Finance vide Gazette of India, Extraordinary Notification of Resolution No. 1/1/2008-IC dated 29/08/2008 had implemented revised pay structure (Pay Band & Grade Pay) w.e.f. 01/01/2006 whereas the implementation of MACPS was made effective from 0110912008, Accordingly, Ministry of Railways also implemented revised Pay structure w.e.f. 01/01/2006 vide its order dated 04/09/2008 while the rates of Non Practicing Allowance (NPA) were revised w.e.f. 01/01/2006 vide Board’s order dated 22/09/2008. Therefore, the MACPS which is part of Pay structure as decided by Apex Court should be given effect from 01/01/2006 in railways and all other Central Government departments.
    • Another important fact which cannot be ignored is, that the Apex Court had held that the benefit of ACP granted to an employee is part of the Pay structure which not only affects the pay but also pension of the employee, therefore, decided that the ACP is not allowance but a part of pay. At the same time, the Hon’ble Supreme Court further held that there can be no dispute that grant of ACP is part of pay structure and that the resolution dated 30/08/2008 relating to implementation of 6th CPC recommendations on pay structure, pay bands, grade pay etc have been given effect from 0110112006 and also added that this is the decision of the Cabinet which could not have been modified by issuing executive instructions.
    NFIR suggests that while issuing modified instructions, in compliance with Apex Court order, the DoP&T may allow option opportunity to all those beneficiaries of ACPS as well MACPS to exercise their option for financial upgradation from the dates advantageous to them so as to avoid further grievances.
    [post_ads_2]
    Summing up, NFIR urges upon the DoP&T to kindly consider the above points and issue modified instructions for granting financial upgradation under MACPS with effect from 01/01/2006 as was done by the Ministry of Defence. A copy of the instructions issued may be endorsed to this Federation.


    Yours faithfully,

    (Dr.M.Raghavaiah)
    General Secretary

    Source: NFIR

    CHS and Dental Doctors to serve the Govt upto 65 years: Option form & DoHFW OM

    $
    0
    0
    CHS and Dental Doctors to serve the Govt upto 65 years: Option form & DoHFW OM

    A.12034/4/2018-CHS.V
    Government of India
    Ministry of Health and Family Welfare
    Department of Health and Family Welfare
    Nirman Bhawan, New Delhi
    Dated. 13th August, 2018

    OFFICE MEMORANDUM 

    SUBJECT- FUNDAMENTAL (SECOND AMENDMENT) RULES, 2018 - OPTION TO BE SUBMITTED BY CHS AND DENTAL DOCTORS TO SERVE THE GOVERNMENT UPTO 65 YEARS - Reg.

    The undersigned is directed to forward herewith the Department of Personnel and Training's notification No. GSR 767(E) published in the Gazette Of lndia dated 11.08.2018 vide which the age of superannuation in respect of the doctors belonging to Central Government and Central Government entities including Central Health Service (CHS) and dental doctors under the Department of Health and Family Welfare shall be 62 years unless they exercise the Option of posting to teaching/ clinical/ patient care/implementation of health programmes/ Public Health Programmes and functions and other areas/functions including advisory and consultancy etc. depending on their expertise and experience as decided by the competent authority from time to time, in case they desire to continue in their service upto the age of 65 years.
    [post_ads]
    2. in pursuance to the above mentioned notification, it has been decided that the option in the prescribed format may be submitted by the doctors of Central Health Service and dental doctors under the Department of Health and Family Welfare who have already attained the age of 62 years or attaining the age of 62 years within 6 months from the date of publication of these amendment rules dated 11.08.2018 for their further posting to teaching/ clinical/ patient care/implementation of health programmes/ Public Health Programmes and functions and other areas/functions including advisory and consultancy etc depending on the field of their expertise/experience, in case they desire to continue in the service upto the age of 65 years.

    3. The serving doctors belonging to the CHS and dental doctors of Department of Health and Family Welfare who have already attained the age Of 62 years or attaining the age of 62 years within 6 months from the date of publication of these amendment rules dated 11.08.2018 may exercise their option for posting to teaching/ clinical/ patient care/implementation of health programmes/ Public Health Programmes and functions and other areas/functions including advisory and consultancy etc depending on the field of their expertise/experience, within a period of 30 days from the date of commencement of the Fundamental (Second Amendment) Rules, 2018.

    4. The doctors working in Organisations /Hospitals/Institutions, etc. under the administrative control Of the Department of Health and Family Welfare, Government of indie and meeting the criteria mentioned in para 3 above may furnish their option through their respective Heads of Organisations Hospitals/institutions, etc. within the period specified in para 3 above to the Joint Secretary (CHS), Department of Health and Family Welfare, Nirman Bhawan, New Delhi-110001.
    [post_ads_2]
    5. The serving doctors belonging to the CHS and dental doctors of Department of Health and Family Welfare who fail to exercise the option with regard to their continuation in service upto 65 years as mentioned in para 3 above shall stand superannuated from their service on attaining the age Of 62 years or on expiry of 30 days, as the case may be, from the date of commencement of the Fundamental (Second Amendment) Rules, 2018 dated 11.08.2018 whichever is later.

    6. As this will be an ongoing process, the heads of Organisations, Hospitals / Institutions under the Department of Health and Family Welfare should send the ‘option’ to be submitted by the doctors who are going to attain the age of 62 years, in the prescribed format 6 months in advance, to this department i.e. to Joint Secretary (CHS), Department of Health and Family Welfare, Nirman Bhawan, New Delhi. The doctors who fail to exercise the ‘option’ with regard to their continuation in service upto 65 years as mentioned in para 3 above and within the period specified above, shall stand superannuated from their service on attaining the age of 62 years.

    7. The other Ministries/Department etc, concerned with the implementation of the Union Cabinet decision dated 27.06.2018 concerned with the implementation of the decision and are covered by the provisions of FR56(bb) are hereby provided a copy of the notification amending FR56(bb). A copy of Option Form prescribed for the doctors of CH8 and Dental doctors of MoHFW is enclosed for reference / guidance.

    8. These instructions are available on this Department’s website i. e. www.mohfw.gov.in

    9. These instructions may be brought to the notice of all concerned including doctors of CHS and dental doctors under the Department of Health and Family Welfare.

    ENCLS:
    (I) DOPT Notification GSR 767(E) DATED 11.8.2018
    (II) COPY OF OPTION FORMAT
    (S.C.Rajeev)
    Director

    OPTION FOR CONTINUING SERVICE UPTO 65 YEARS BY
    DOCTORS OF CENTRAL HEALTH SERVICE
    ON ATTAINING 62 YEARS OF AGE

    SL NO.DETAILS
    01Name
    02Employee Code
    04Date of Birth
    05Educational Qualification
    06Telephone No. (Office)
    (Resi.)
    (Mobile)
    07E-mail ID
    08Present Address
    09Permanent Address

    2. In pursuance of Ministry of Health and Family Welfare’s O.M. No. A-12034/4/2018-CHS-V, dated: 13.08.2018 and Department of Personnel and Training’s notification No. GSR 767(E) dated 11.08.2018 I,
    Dr.___________________________, working as ___________________________ in the sub cadre of GDMO/Teaching/Non-Teaching/Public Health of Central Health Service have already attained the age of 62 years on ______________/going to attain the age of 62 years on ________________, am exercising the option to be posted to Teaching/Clinical/Patient Care/ Implementation of Health Programmes/ Implementation of Public Health programmes including advisory, consultancy, etc as given under:-.
    SL NO.OPTIONPREFERENCE OF OPTION (TO BE INDICATED FROM 1 TO 7)
    01Teaching
    02Clinical
    04Patient Care
    05Implementation of Health Programmes
    06Implementation of Public Health programmes
    07Advisory
    08Consultancy

    3. I am aware that I will be considered for posting to posts other than administrative posts at the desired field as per my option indicated subject to availability of vacancy and administrative convenience and as decided by the Competent Authority. Further, I shall not stake any claim for posting to any additional administrative posts notified in future. I also understand that my continuation in service is subject to Government of India rules/instructions, etc issued from time to time.

    (Signature of the Officer)
    Name ...........................
    Stamp............/Date.......


    option-form-for-posting-after-62-years-doctors
    Option Form

    Source:Click here to view/download the PDF
    [https://mohfw.gov.in/sites/default/files/OM%20relation%20to%2065%20yrs.pdf]

    Clarification regarding the term ‘Non-Family Station’ in respect of concessional retention of Govt Accommodation

    $
    0
    0
    Clarification regarding the term ‘Non-Family Station’ in respect of concessional retention of Govt Accommodation

    F.No.12035/4/2015-Poll.II
    Government of India
    Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs
    Directorate of Estates
    Policy-II Section

    Nirman Bhavan, New Delhi -110 108
    Dated the 1st August, 2018

    Office Memorandum

    Subject: Clarification regarding the term ‘Non-Family Station’ in respect of concessional retention given under Rule 43 of CGGPRA Rules, 2017.

    In continuation to the OM. of even Number dated 10.4.2018 vide which the concessional retention of General Pool Residential Accommodation at the last place of posting by Central Government Civilian Employees, Centrally Armed Paramilitary Forces employees and officers of All India Services on their posting to a Non-family stations was extended up to 30.06.2021 on payment of normal rate of licence fee, it is further clarified that the term ‘Non Family station’ includes:
    [post_ads]
    (i) North Eastern Region, Sikkim, Andaman & Nicobar Islands and Lakshadweep, State of Jammu & Kashmir

    (ii) Left Wing Extremist (LWE) areas, as declared by Ministry of Home Affairs from time to time.

    2. All the other terms and conditions of OM dated 10.4.2018 will remain unchanged.

    (Swarnali Banerjee)
    Deputy Director of Estates (Policy)


    To
    1. All Ministries / Department of the Government of India
    2. All Officers / Sections in the Directorate of Estates
    3. All Regional offices of Directorate of Estates/CPWD
    4. On the website of Directorate of Estates
    [post_ads_2]
    Copy for information to:
    1. PS to Hon’ble HUAM
    2. PS to MoS(HUA)
    3. PSO to Secretary, MoHUA
    4. PPS to JS(L&E), MoHUA
    5. PS to DE/DE-II
    6. AD(OL) for Hindi translation
    7. Guard File
    clarification-regarding-non-family-station-retention-of-quarters

    [http://estates.gov.in/open-file?fileName=clarification%20of%20nonfamily%20station%20dt_1534223360810.pdf&fileType=pdf]

    7th CPC Pension Revision for KVS - Option regarding commutation of additional amount of pension

    $
    0
    0
    7th CPC Pension Revision for KVS - Option regarding commutation of additional amount of pension

    KENDRIYA VIDYALAYA SANGATHAN (HQ) 
    18. Institutional Area, 
    SaheedJeet Singh Marg 
    New Delhi-110016 

    F.110230(Misc.)2018/KVS(HQ)/P&I/2362 
    Dated: 21.08.2018 
    The Deputy Commissioner/Director, 
    Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan, 
    All Regional Offices/ZIETs, 

    Sub:- Implementation of the recommendation of the 7th CPC – Option regarding commutation of additional amount of pension. 

    It is to inform that Govt. of India vide its OM No. 42/14/2016-P&PW(G) dated 24.10.2016 has provided an option to the pensioners retired between 01.01.2016 to 04.08.2016, in relaxation of Rule 10 of CCS (Commutation of Pension) Rules,1981, not to commute the pension which has become additionally commutable on revision of pay/pension on implementation of recommendations of the 7th CPC. 
    [post_ads]
    The Govt. of India OM is also enclosed for ready reference. 

    End: As above 
    Yours faithfully 
    (A.K. Srivastava) 
    Assistant Commissioner (Finance) 

    kvs-7th-cpc-option-regarding-commutation-of-additional-amount-of-pension


    No.42/14/2016-P&PW(G) 
    Government of India 
    Ministry of Personnel, PG & Pensions 
    Department of Pension & Pensioners Welfare 

    ******* 

    3rd Floor, Lok Nayak Bhawan 
    khan Market, New Delhi-110003 
    Date:- 24th Oct, 2016 

    OFFICE MEMORANDUM 
    [post_ads]
    Subject:- Implementation of the recommendation of the 7th CPC – Option regarding commutation of additional amount of pension. 

    The undersigned is directed to state that in pursuance of Government’s decision on recommendation of 7th Central Pay Commission, orders have been issued for revision of provisions regulating pension / gratuity / commutation of pension etc. vide this Department’s OM 38/37/2016-P&PW(A) dated 04.08.2016. In para of the said OM, it has been mentioned that there will be no change in the provisions relating to commutation values, the limit upto which the pension can be commuted or the period after which the commuted pension is to be restored. 

    2. As per Rule 10 of CCS (Commutation of Pension) Rules, 1981, an applicant who has commuted a percentage of his final pension and after commutation his pension has been revised and enhanced retrospectively as a result of Government’s decision, the applicant shall be paid the difference between the commuted value determined with reference to enhanced pension and the commuted value already authorised. For the payment of difference, the applicant shall not be required to apply afresh. 

    3. References have been received in this Department that many pensioners who retired after 01.01.2016 and have drawn pension/commuted value of pension based on their pre-revised pay/pension do not wish to commute the pension which has become additionally commutable on revision of pay/pension on implementation of recommendations of 7th CPC. the matter has been examined in consultation with Ministry of Finance (Department of Expenditure), It has been decided that those pensioners who retired from 01.01.2016 till 04.08.2016 i.e. the date of issue of orders for revised pay/pension based on the recommendations of the 7th CPC may be given an option, in relaxation of Rule 10 of CCS (Commutation of Pension) Rules, 1981, not to commute the pension which has become additionally commutable on revision of pay/pension on implementation of recommendations of the 7th CPC. The Cases where the additional pension after 7th CPC has already been commuted will not be re-opened. 

    4. In their application to the employees of Indian Audit and Accounts Department, these orders issue in consultation with Comptroller and Auditor General of India. 

    5. This issues with the concurrence of Ministry of Finance, Department of Expenditure ID No.192/E.V/2016, dated 30.09.2016. 

    6. Hindi version will follow 

    (Sujasha Choudhury) 
    Director(Pension)
    [http://kvsangathan.nic.in/GeneralDocuments/ANN(1)-23-08-2018.PDF]

    नई पेंशन स्कीम के विरोध में कर्मचारियों को एकजुट करेगा एआईआरएफ

    $
    0
    0
    एनपीएस के विरोध में कर्मचारियों को एकजुट करेगा एआईआरएफ

    hindi-news-on-nps-protest

    नार्दन रेलवे मेंस यूनियन की केंद्रीय समिति की बैठक में उत्तर भारत के विभिन्न प्रांतों से आए कर्मचारी नेताओं ने केंद्र और राज्य कर्मचारियों के समक्ष आ रही चुनौतियों पर चर्चा की। आल इंडिया रेलवे मेंस फेडरेशन के महामंत्री क. शिवगोपाल मिश्रा ने कहा कि सरकार ने एनपीएस (नई पेंशन स्कीम) के नाम पर केंद्र और राज्य कर्मचारियों के साथ धोखा किया है। एआईआरएफ केंद्रीय और राज्य कर्मचारियों को एक मंच पर लाकर पुरानी पेंशन लागू करने के लिए आंदोलन करेगा।.
    [post_ads]
    केंद्रीय सिमिति की बैठक के दौरान महांमत्री शिवगोपाल मिश्रा ने कहा कि एक जनवरी वर्ष 2004 के बाद भर्ती कर्मचारियों को नई पेंशन स्कीम में शामिल किया गया है। पेंशन के लाभ के लिए कर्मचारियों के वेतन से 10 प्रतिशत की कटौती की जा रही है। इस पैसे का उपयोग कहां किया जा रहा है, इसकी जानकारी कर्मचारियों को नहीं दी गई। नई पेंशन स्कीम में फैमली पेंशन की गारंटी नहीं है। कहा कि वर्ष 2016 में उनकी केंद्र सरकार के संगठनों, गृहमंत्री, वित्त मंत्री, रेलवे मंत्री और रेल राज्य मंत्री के साथ कई बैंठकें हुईं, लेकिन कर्मचारियों की मांगों को लेकर कोई फैसला नहीं हुआ। कहा कि सातवें वेतन आयोग के लागू होने के बाद विसंगतियों दूर किया जाना, एनपीएस के दायरे में आने वाले सभी कर्मचारियों के लिए पेंशन की गारंटी और पारिवारिक पेंशन का प्रावधान, निजीकरण के प्रयास समाप्त करना, न्यूनतम वेतन 18 हजार से 26 हजार करने और रनिंग स्टाफ के भत्ते में बढोतरी आदि मांगों पर अब तक सरकार ने अपना रुख स्पष्ट नहीं किया है। कहा कि एआईआरएफ सभी केंद्र और राज्य कर्मचारियों को एकजुट कर पहले जिला फिर प्रदेश और अंत में राष्ट्रीय स्तर पर आंदोलन शुरू करेगी। आगामी शीतकालीन संसदीय सत्र के दौरान दिल्ली में विशाल रैली आयोजित की जाएगी, जिसमें देशभर से पांच लाख कर्मचारियों के शामिल होने की संभावना हैं। इसके बाद भी सरकार मांगें नहीं मानती तो कर्मचारी अनिश्चितिकालीन हड़ताल करेंगे। बैठक में एस के त्यागी अध्यक्ष नरमू, डीएन चौबे सहायक महांमत्री नरमू, महेंद्र श्रीवास्तव निदेशक एआइआरएफ, शाखा सचिव अजय तोमर, वीके श्रीवास्तव अध्यक्ष सहायक शाखा सचिव ओमवीर सिंह, गोपाल चौधरी उपाध्यक्ष, संजय, दुर्गेश खन्ना, पुष्पा देवी, पंकज आदि मौजूद रहे। .


    फेडरेशन के महामंत्री शिवगोपाल मिश्रा कहा कि वर्तमान में फेडरेशन से सात लाख कर्मचारी जुड़े हैं। अगर इनमें से केवल चार लाख कर्मचारी ही हड़ताल पर चले जाएं तो रेलवे का कामकाज ठप हो जाएगा।
    [post_ads_2]
    कर्मचारी नेताओं ने कहा कि वर्तमान में रेलवे में कर्मचारियों के 2 लाख से ज्यादा पद रिक्त हैं। नए कर्मचारी भर्ती करने के बजाय रेलवे रिटायर कर्मचारियों को काम पर वापस बुला रही है। ठेकेदारी व्यवस्था को बढ़ावा दिया जा रहा है। ठेकेदारी पर कर्मचारी भर्ती किए जा रहे हैं। .

    बैठक में ऑल इंडिया रेलवे मैंस फेडरेशन के नौ डिविजन के पदाधिकारियों ने शिरकत की । बैठक में देशभर से सभी नौ डिविजन के 250 शाखा सचिव और अध्यक्ष प्रतिनिधि के तौर पर शामिल हुए।
    (Source: Livehindustan)

    7th CPC CCS (RP) Rules - Promotion between 01.01.2016 to 27.07.2017: Chance to re-exercise/revise option for fixation of pay under FR 22(I)(a)(1)

    $
    0
    0
    7th CPC CCS (RP) Rules - Promotion between 01.01.2016 to 27.07.2017: Chance to re-exercise/revise option for fixation of pay under FR 22(I)(a)(1) 

    No.13/02/2017-Estt.(Pay-I) 
    Government of India 
    Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions 
    Department of Personnel & Training 

    North Block, New Delhi 
    Dated: 28th August , 2018 

    OFFICE MEMORANDUM

    Subject: Availability of option for fixation of pay on promotion from the Date of Next Increment (DNI) in the lower post and method of fixation of pay from DNI, if opted for, in context of CCS (RP) Rules, 2016- clarification-regarding. 
    [post_ads]
    The undersigned is directed to refer to this Department’s OM of even number dated 27.07.2017, on the subject cited above. Following the issuance of the OM ibid, this Department has received a number of references seeking clarification on various aspects of the OM ibid. The matter has been considered in this Department in consultation with D/o Expenditure and the points of doubt are clarified as under:

    Click to view: Applicability of FR 22(I)(a)(1) in 7th CPC CCS(RP) Rules, 2016 on Promotion/MACP- DoPT illustrated the method of fixation of pay from DNI - DoPT OM dated 27.07.2017

    Sl. No.Point of DoubtClarification
    1.The date of applicability of the OM ibidSince the OM ibid is in the context of 7th CPC scenario, it is applicable from 01.01.2016
    2.Whether the employees who have been granted the pay fixation benefit on account of promotion between 01.01.2016 and the date of issuance of the OM ibid i.e. 27.07.2017, would be allowed to re-exercise/revise their option for fixation of pay under FR 22(I)(a)(1)Under the changes circumstances, after the issuance of this Department's OM ibid, the employees shall be allowed to re-exercise/revise their option for fixation of pay under FR 22(I)(a)(1), within one month from the date of issuance of this OM. Further, the option so revised, shall be final.

    2. In so far as their application to the employees belonging to the Indian Audit and Accounts Department is concerned, these orders issue in consultation with the Comptroller & Auditor General of India. 
    [post_ads_2]
    3. Hindi Version will follow. 
    (Rajeev Bahree) 
    Under Secretary to the Government of India 
    7th-cpc-promotion-revise-option-for-fixation-from-dni-dopt-om

    [https://dopt.gov.in/sites/default/files/clarification%20of%20option.PDF]

    DA DR hike from July, 2018 @ 2% : Cabinet Approval

    $
    0
    0
    DA DR hike from July, 2018 @ 2% : Cabinet Approval

    Press Information Bureau
    Government of India
    Cabinet

    29-August-2018 13:05 IST

    Cabinet approves additional 2 percent Dearness Allowance (DA) for Central Government employees and Dearness Relief (DR) to pensioners w.e.f. 1st July, 2018

    The Union Cabinet, chaired by the Prime Minister Shri Narendra Modihas approved to release an additional instalment of Dearness Allowance (DA) to Central Government employees and Dearness Relief (DR) to pensioners w.e.f. 01.07.2018 representing an increase of 2% over the existing rate of 7% of the Basic Pay/Pension, to compensate for price rise.
    [post_ads]
    The combined impact on the exchequer on account of both Dearness Allowance and Deamess Relief would be Rs.6112.20 crore per annum and Rs.4074.80 crore in the financial year 2018-19 (for a period of 08 months from July, 2018 to February, 2019).

    This will benefit about 48.41 lakh Central Government employees and 62.03 lakh pensioners.

    This increase is in accordance with the accepted formula, which is based on the recommendations of the 7th Central Pay Commission.
    ******

    3% fitment benefit to Postal Assistants on promotion to the post of Inspector through LDCE even after availing MACP benefit

    $
    0
    0
    3% fitment benefit to Postal Assistants on promotion to the post of Inspector through LDCE even after availing MACP benefit

    No.20-27/2015-SPB-II
    Government of India
    Ministry of Communications
    Department of Posts
    (Personnel Division)

    Dak Bhawan, Sansad Marg
    New Delhi – 110 001

    Dated 20th August, 2018

    To

    All Head of Circles
    All Head of Regions

    Subject: Grant of benefit of pay fixation at time of promotion to Inspector posts.

    Sir/Madam,
    [post_ads]
    I am directed to say that references from various Circles are being received in Directorate seeking clarification on fixation of pay of the Postal Assistants, who have already been granted benefit of financial upgradation under MACP scheme, on their promotion as Inspector posts on the basis of LDCE. Further, consequent upon upgradation of grade pay of Inspector posts to Rs. 4600/- w.e.f. 01.01.2006, disparity in fixation of pay by different Circles has also been noticed by the Directorate while re-fixing pay of Inspector Posts posted in Directorate to the extent that in similar case some Circles have granted promotional increment to the officials who have been granted financial upgradation under MACPs, while others have not allowed, presumably invoking para 4 of Annexure I to MACP guidelines.

    2. The matter has been examined in consultation with Establishment Division of Directorate and it has been decided to convey that Inspector Posts is not in a regular promotional hierarchy of Postal Assistant and they can become Inspector Posts only on attaining merit in Competitive Examination. As such, 3% fitment benefit should be allowed to officials at the time of fixation of pay on promotion to the post of Inspector (Limited Departmental Competitive Examination) even after availing financial upgradation under MACP.
    [post_ads_2]
    3. This may be brought to notice of all concerned.

    Yours faithfully,
    sd/-
    (G.Rajeev)
    Director (SPN)

    Extension of date for filing of Income Tax Returns for taxpayers in Kerala upto 15.09.2018

    $
    0
    0
    MoF: Extension of date for filing Income Tax for taxpayers in Kerala - Press Release

    Ministry of Finance

    Extension of date for filing of Income Tax Returns for taxpayers in Kerala

    Posted On: 28 AUG 2018 7:00PM by PIB Delhi

    In view of the disruption caused due to severe floods in Kerala, the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) hereby further extends the “Due Date” for furnishing Income Tax Returns from 31st August, 2018 to 15th September, 2018 for all Income Tax assessees in the State of Kerala, who were liable to file their Income Tax Returns by 31st August, 2018.
    [post_ads]
    CBDT had earlier extended the ‘Due Date’ for filing of Income Tax Returns from 31st July, 2018 to 31st August, 2018 in respect of the categories of taxpayers who were liable to file their Income Tax Returns by 31st July, 2018.

    ******

    DSM/RM/KA

    Source: PIB

    New Wage for Port and Dock Workers: 10.6% fitment on basic pay plus DA

    $
    0
    0
    Shipping: New Wage Agreement Signed for Port and Dock Workers

    Ministry of Shipping

    New Wage Agreement Signed for Port and Dock Workers
    More than 135,000 Workers to be benefitted
    Major Ports to spend Rs 560 crore for benefit OF port workers
    30 AUG 2018


    A new wage settlement agreement has been signed for Group C & D category of Port and Dock Workers in Mumbai in the presence of Shri Nitin Gadkari, Union Minister for Shipping, Road Transport & Highways and Water Resources, River Development & Ganga Rejuvenation.
    [post_ads]
    The settlement provides for 10.6% fitment on basic pay plus DA. The lowest grade of workers would get a pay-scale of Rs.20900-43600 and the highest grade worker would get a pay-scale of Rs 36500-88700.

    More than 32,000 Port and Dock workers and 1,05,000 Group C&D pensioners across all Major Ports will be benefitted from of this settlement. The Overall financial implication of this settlement for all the Major Ports for serving and pensioners is likely to be about Rs.560 crore per annum.

    Speaking on the occasion Shri Gadkari said, "As per the vision of Prime Minister Shri Narendra Modi, welfare of the people is the chief priority of the Government, and I am glad that Major Ports are becoming drivers of socio-economic change. Major Ports have become pioneers in taking this initiative, being the first to sign the wage settlement for Group C & D employees."
    [post_ads_2]
    The settlement has been signed between six Port and Dock Workers' Federations and the Port Management under Section 12(3) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, before the Regional Labour Commissioner, representing Chief Labour Commissioner. The Settlement would come into force from January 1, 2017 in retrospect. This is a five-year settlement arrived at in the port sector against the ten-year periodicity in many of the major public sector enterprises.

    PIB

    New wage scale and drawal of arrears to GDS substitutes:AIPEU

    $
    0
    0
    New wage scale and drawal of arrears to GDS substitutes

    ALL INDIA POSTAL EMPLOYEES UNION - GDS

    No. AIPEU-GDS/CHQ/TRCA/2018
    Dt. 23-08-2018

    To
    The Secretary.
    Department of Posts
    Dak Bhawan
    New Delhi - 110 001

    Respected Sir.

    Sub:- Applicability of new wage scale and drawal of arrears to GDS substitutes- req - reg.

    I would like to brought this to the kind notice of the Secretary, Department of Posts that after implementation of new TRCA to the GDS vide order dated 25-06-2018, all regularly working GDS have been dawn new TRCA w.e.f 01-07-2018. In case of substitutes working in place of GDS viz., vacant posts. officiating to Departmental posts (Postman/MTS/MG) and on other reasons has not drawn their allowances as per new TRCA slabs w.e.f 01-07-2018.
    [post_ads]
    Further it is requested to issue the instructions to draw the arrears also from 01-01-2016 to 30- 06-2018 to the substitutes working in place of GDS. As it was drawn also at the time of implementation of Natarajamurty Committee recommendations vide Lr.No. No.6-1/2009-PE.II, Dated : 30-05-2012.

    Hence it is requesting our Hon’ble Secretary. Department of Posts kindly cause to issue necessary instructions to the concerning authorities on the subject at the earliest in favour of GDS.

    A line in reply is highly solicited.
    [post_ads_2]
    Yours sincerely.
    Sd/-
    (P.Pandurangarao)
    General Secretary

    AIPEU-GDS

    Reservation in Promotion: SC Reserves order on pleas to review verdict quota benefits to SC/ST employees

    $
    0
    0
    Supreme Court reserves order on pleas to review verdict on quota benefits to SC/ST employees
    supreme-court-reservation-in-promotion

    The Supreme Court on Thursday reserved its verdict on petitions seeking a seven-bench examination of its judgment in the M Nagaraj case which had put conditions for granting quota benefits for job promotions to SC/ST employees working in the public sector.

    A five-judge constitution bench, headed by Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra, reserved the order on whether the 12-year-old verdict granting reservation to SC/ST employees working in the public sector required consideration by a larger bench or not.

    The 2006 verdict said that “the state is not bound to make reservation for SC/ST in matter of promotions. However, if they wish to exercise their discretion and make such provision, the state has to collect quantifiable data showing backwardness of the class and inadequacy of representation of that class in public employment in addition to compliance of Article 335.”
    [post_ads]
    The verdict also mandated the state to ensure that the reservation did not lead to excessiveness so as to breach the upper ceiling of 50 per cent or obliterate the creamy layer or extend the reservation indefinitely.

    The Centre and various state governments had sought reconsideration of this verdict on various grounds, including that the members of the SC/ST communities are presumed to be backward and considering their stigma of caste, they should be given reservation even in job promotions.

    Alleging that the Nagraj verdict had put unnecessary conditions in granting quota benefits to the SC/ST employees, the Centre sought its reconsideration by a larger bench.

    Appearing for the Centre, Attorney General K K Venugopal said there was a presumption of backwardness in their favour. He said the SC/ST communities have been facing caste-based discrimination for long and the stigma of caste is attached to them despite the fact that some of them have come up.

    Senior advocate Rajeev Dhavan, appearing for one of the petitioners, had earlier contended that a lot of confusion has occurred due to conflicting judicial pronouncements given by different benches of the apex court and high courts.

    At the hearing on Wednesday, senior advocate Rakesh Dwivedi, who represented those opposing quota in promotions, had told the bench that earlier there was presumption of backwardness with regard to SC/ST communities. There should not be quota in promotions for higher services as the presumption of backwardness of SC and ST employees “vanishes” once they join government service, he had claimed.
    [post_ads]
    Dwivedi added that the quota in promotions for SC/ST may be continued for class-IV and class-III services, but should not be allowed for higher services.

    Earlier, the top court had questioned the logic behind granting quota in promotions in government jobs to the kith and kin of affluent persons among the SC and ST communities who have been holding high official positions. It had asked why the ‘creamy layer’ principle, used to exclude the affluent among other backward classes (OBCs) from enjoying the fruits of reservation, cannot be made applicable to deny quota benefits in promotion to those affluent among the SCs and STs.
    (With PTI inputs)

    Travelling on official tour/LTC in private airlines (other than Air India): DoT OM

    $
    0
    0
    travelling on official tour/LTC in private airlines (other than Air India): DoT OM

    F.No.9-21/2017-Fin. (Pt-II)
    Government of India
    Ministry of Communications
    Department of Telecommunications
    (Finance Branch)

    New Delhi, the 20th August, 2018

    OFFICE MEMORANDUM


    Subject:- Procedure to process cases to accord exemption for air travel in airlines other than Air India in individual cases - Regarding.

    Reference is invited to Department of Expenditure OM. No.19024/1/2009-E.IV dated 07.06.2016 on the subject cited above. In this context it is observed that a considerable number of cases in connection with travelling on official tour/LTC in private airlines (other than Air India) are being received for according post-facto approval. Availing the services of private airlines and subsequently seeking post-facto relaxation/approval is not a healthy practice.
    [post_ads]
    2. With a view to avoid/the following procedure is prescribed for travelling on official tour/LTC:-

    (a) Officers should prepare tour programme sufficiently in advance and tickets for Air India be booked.

    (b) The guidelines issued by the Ministry of Finance for relaxation to travel by airlines other than Air India must be adhered to and request for relaxation be submitted at least seven (7) working days in advance from the date of travel.

    (c) The tickets in either case should be booked either from the website of the Airlines or through the authorized agents nominated by the Ministry of Finance.

    (d) Proposals for according post-facto approvals will not be entertained. However, in deserving cases, the proposal may be submitted with full justification for not obtaining prior approval.

    3. The contents of this Circular may be brought to the notice of all concerned.
    [post_ads_2]
    (Smruti Ranjan Swain)
    DIRECTOR (FINANCE)
    Source: http://dot.gov.in
    [http://dot.gov.in/sites/default/files/20.08.2018.pdf?download=1]

    Master Circular on Technical resignation and lien in Central Services: DoPT seeks comments/views

    $
    0
    0
    Updated Master Circular on Lien/Technical resignation in Central Services 

    No. 28020/2/2018-Estt.(C) 
    Government of India 
    Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances & Pensions 
    (Department of Personnel & Training) 

    North Block, New Delhi 
    Dated - 27th August, 2018 

    OFFICE MEMORANDUM 


    Subject: Master Circular on Technical resignation and lien in Central Services-reg. 

    The undersigned is directed to refer to this Departments OM No. 28020/1/2010 dated 17.08.16 on the above subject and to say that guidelines/ instructions regarding lien/technical resignation have been issued from time to time. It is now proposed to further consolidate these instructions to provide clarity and ease of reference. 

    2. Before the Master Circular is finalized, it is requested to furnish comments/views in this regard, if any, by 10.9.20 18 to the undersigned at the e-mail address: jha.sn[@]nic.in. 
    [post_ads]
    (Surya Narayan Jha) 
    Under secretary to the Government of India 
    Telefax: 23094248 

    No. 28020/3/2018-Estt.(C) 
    Government of India 
    Ministry of Personnel, PG and Pensions 
    Department of Personnel & Training 

    North Block, New Delhi 
    Dated: , 2018 

    OFFICE MEMORANDUM 

    Subject: Master Circular on Technical resignation and Lien in Central Services-reg. 

    The undersigned is directed to refer to this Department's O.M No. 28020/ 1/2010-Estt(C) dated 17.08.16 wherein consolidated instructions on Lien / Technical resignation were issued. 

    2. It has been decided to consolidate the instructions/guidelines in relation to on Lien/ Technical resignation as a Master Circular to provide clarity and ease of reference. The consolidated guidelines issued vide O.M. dated 17.08.16 has been suitably updated as on date and the same is enclosed. The list of O.Ms issued till date is at Appendix. 
    [post_ads_2]
    (N. Sriraman) 
    Director (Establishment) 
    Telefax: 23094637 



    Master Circular on Lien/Technical resignation in Central Services 

    TECHNICAL RESIGNATION 

    1. As per the Ministry of Finance OM No. 3379-E.III (B)/65 dated the 17th June, 1965, the resignation is treated as a technical formality where a Government servant has applied through proper channel for a post in the same or some other Department, and is on selection, required to resign from the previous post for administrative reasons. The resignation will be treated as technical resignation if these conditions are met, even if the Government servant has not mentioned the word "Technical" while submitting his resignation. The benefit of past service, if otherwise admissible under rules, may be given in such cases. Resignation in other cases including where competent authority has not allowed the Government servant to forward the application through proper channel will not be treated as a technical resignation and benefit of past service will not be admissible. Also, no question of benefit of a resignation being treated as a technical resignation arises in case of it being from a post held on ad hoc basis. 



    2. This benefit is also admissible to Government servants who have applied before joining the Government service and on that account the application was not routed through proper channel. The benefit of past service is allowed in such cases subject to the fulfilment of the following conditions:-

    a.  the Government servant should intimate the detalls of such application immediately on her joining;
    b.  the Government servant at the time of resignation should specifically make a request, indicating that she is resigning to take up another appointment under Government for which she had applied before joining the Government service;
    c.  the authority accepting the resignation should satisfy itself that had the employee been in service on the date of application for the post mentioned by the employee, her application would have been forwarded through proper channel. 
      Carry forward of Leave benefits 

      3. In terms of Rule 9(2) of the CCS (Leave) Rules, 1972, technical resignation shall not result in the lapse of leave to the credit of the Government servant. The balance of unutilised CCL as well as all other leaves of the kind due & admissible will be carried forward. 

      4 As per rule 39-D of the CCS(Leave) Rules,1972, in case of permanent absorption in PSUs/ Autonomous Bodies! State Government etc., the Government servant shall be granted cash equivalent of leave salary in respect of EL & HPL at his credit subject to overall limit of 300 days. 

      Carry forward of LTC 

      5. Entitlement to LTC may be carried forward in case of a Central Government Servant who joins another post after having submitted Technical Resignation. In case of a Govt Servant who resigns within 8 years of his appointment and joins another post in the Government after Technical Resignation, Govt Servant will be treated as a fresh recruit for a period of 8 years from the date of his initial appointment under Government. Thus, if a Government servant joins another Department after serving in Government for 4 years, he will be treated as a fresh recruit for 4 years in the new Department. 

      Pay Protection, eligibility of past service for reckoning of the minimum period for grant of Annual Increment 

      6. In cases of appointment of a Government servant to another post in Government on acceptance of technical resignation, the protection of pay is given in terms of the Ministry of Finance OM No. 3379-E.III (B)/65 dated the 17th June, 1965 read with provisions of FR 22-B. Thus, if the pay fixed in the new post is less than his pay in the post he holds substantively, he will draw the presumptive pay of the post he holds substantively as defined in FR-9(24). Past service rendered by such a Government servant is taken into account for reckoning of the minimum period for grant of annual increment in the new post/ service/ cadre in Government under the provisions of FR 26 read with Rule 10 of CCS(RP) Rules, 2016. In case the Government servant re-joins his earlier posts, he will be entitled to increments for the period of his absence from the post. 

      7. GPF transfer 

      Transfer of GPF on technical resignation would be governed by Rule 35 of the General Provident Fund (Central Services) Rules, 1960. 

      8. Seniority 

      On technical resignation seniority in the post held by the Government servant on substantive basis continues to be protected. However, in case of a Government servant deciding to rejoin his substantive post, the period spent in the another Department which he had joined after submitting his technical resignation will not count for minimum qualifying service for promotion in the higher post. 

      9. Applicability of Pension Scheme 

      In cases where Government servants, who had originally joined government service prior to 01.01.2004, apply for posts in the same or other Departments and on selection they are asked to tender technical resignation, the past services are counted towards pension if the new post is in a pensionable establishment in terms of Rule 26(2) of CCS(Pension) Rules 1972. They will thus continue to be covered under the CCS(Pension) Rules, 1972 even if they join the new post after 01.01.2004. 

      10. New Pension Scheme 

      In case of 'Technical Resignation' of Government servant covered under National Pension System (NPS), the balance standing to their Personal Retirement Account (PRA) along-with their PRAN, will be carried forward to the new office. 

      11. Transfer of Service Book from parent Department to present Department. 

      As per SR- 198, the Service Book is to be maintained for a Government servant from the date of his/her first appointment to Government service and it must be kept in the custody of the Head of Office in which he is serving and transferred with him from office to office. 

      12. Need for Medical examination. 

      In cases where a person has already been examined by a Medical Board in respect of his previous appointment and if standard of medical examination prescribed for the new post is the same, then he need not be required to undergo a fresh examination. 

      13. Verification of Character & Antecedents 

      In the case of a person who was originally employed in an office of the Central Government, if the period intervening between date of discharge from his previous office and the date of securing a new appointment, is less than a year, it would be sufficient if the appointing authority, before making the appointment, satisfies itself by a reference to the office in which the candidate was previously employed that (a) that office have verified his character and antecedents; and (b) his conduct while in the employ in that office did not render him unsuitable for employment under Government. If, however, more than a year has lapsed after the discharge of the person from his previous office, verification should be carried out in full/afresh. 

      Lien

      14. Lien is defined in FR-9 (13). It represents the right of a Government employee to hold a regular post, whether permanent or temporary, either immediately or on the termination of the period of absence. The benefit of having a lien in a post/service/cadre is enjoyed by all employees who are confirmed in the post/service/cadre of entry or who have been promoted to a higher post, declared as having completed the probation where it is prescribed. It is also available to those who have been promoted on regular basis to a higher post where no probation is prescribed under the rules, as the case may be. 

      15. The above right will, however, be subject to the condition that the junior-most person in the cadre will be liable to be reverted to the lower post/service/cadre if at any time the number of persons so entitled is more than the posts available in that cadre / service. 

      16. Lien on a post 

      A Government servant who has acquired a lien on a post retains a lien on that post—

      (a) while performing the duties of that post;
      (b) while on foreign service, or holding a temporary post or officiating in another post;
      (c) during joining time on transfer to another post; unless he is transferred substantively to a post on lower pay, in which case his lien is transferred to the new post from the date on which he is relieved of his duties in the old post;
      (d) while on leave; and
      (e) while under suspension. 
        A Government servant on acquiring a lien on a post will cease to hold any lien previously acquired on any other post. 

        17. Retention of lien for appointment in another central government office/state government 

        i.  A permanent Government servant appointed in another Central Government Department/Office/ State Government, has to resign from his parent department unless he reverts to that department within a period of 2 years, or 3 years in exceptional cases. An undertaking to abide by this condition may be taken from him at the time of forwarding of his application to other departments / offices.
        ii. The exceptional cases may be when the Government servant is not confirmed in the department/office where he has joined within a period of 2 years. In such cases he may be permitted to retain the lien in the parent department! office for one more year. While granting such permission, a fresh undertaking similar to the one indicated above may be taken from the employee.
        iii.  Timely action should be taken to ensure extension! reversion/ resignation of the employees to their parent cadres on completion of the prescribed period of 2/3 years. In cases, where employees do not respond to instructions, suitable action should be initiated against them for violating the agreement/ undertaking given by them as per (i) and (ii) above and for termination of their lien. Adequate opportunity may, however, be given to the officer prior to such consideration.
        iv.  Temporary Government servants will be required to sever connections with the Government in case of their selection for outside posts. No lien will be retained in such cases. 
          18. Termination of Lien 

          A Government servant's lien on a post may in no circumstances be terminated even with his consent if the result will be to leave him without a lien upon a permanent post. Unless his lien is transferred, a Government servant holding substantively a permanent post retains lien on that post. It will not be correct to deny a Government servant lien to a post he was holding substantively on the plea that he had not requested for retention of lien while submitting his Technical Resignation, or to relieve such a Government servant with a condition that no lien will be retained. 

          A Government employee's lien on a post shall stand terminated on his acquiring a lien on a permanent post (whether under the Central Government or a State Government) outside the cadre on which he is borne. 

          No lien shall be retained: 

          (a) where a Government servant has proceeded on immediate absorption basis to a post or service outside his service/ cadre/ post in the Government from the date of absorption; and
          (b) on foreign service/ deputation beyond the maximum limit admissible under the orders of the Government issued from time to time. 
            19. Transfer of Lien 

            The lien of a Government servant, who is not performing the duties of the post to which the lien pertains, can be transferred to another post in the same cadre subject to the provisions of Fundamental Rule 15. 

            20. Joining Time, Joining Time Pay &Travelling Allowance Provisions relating to joining time are as follows: 

            20.1 For appointment to posts under the Central Government on results of a competition and/or interview open to Government servants and others, Central Government employees and permanent/ provisionally permanent State Government employees will be entitled to joining time under the CCS(Joining Time) Rules,1979. Joining time will be included as qualifying service in the new job. 

            20.2 A Government servant on joining time shall be regarded as on duty during that period and shall be entitled to be paid joining time pay equal to the pay which was drawn before relinquishment of charge in the old post. He will also be entitled to Dearness Allowance, if any, appropriate to the joining time pay. In addition, he can also draw compensatory allowances like House Rent Allowance as applicable to the old station from which he was transferred. He shall not be allowed Conveyance Allowance or permanent Travelling Allowance. 

            20.3 For appointments to posts under the Central Government on the basis of results of a competition and br interview open to Government servants and others, Central Government employees and permanent/ provisionally permanent State Government employees shall be entitled to Transfer Travelling Allowance(TTA). 

            However, temporary Central Government employees with less than 3 years of regular continuous service would not be entitled for TTA, as they are not entitled joining time pay under Joining Time Rules. 

            APPOINTMENT OF CENTRAL GOVERNMENT SERVANTS IN CENTRAL PUBLIC 
            ENTERPRISE ON IMMEDIATE ABSORPOTION BASIS 

            Regarding granting terminal benefits to the Government servants going over to the Public enterprises on immediate absorption basis, the following terms and conditions may be referred:- 

            21. Release of the Government servants for appointment in the enterprises 

            A Government servant who has been selected for a post in a Central Public Enterprises may be released only after obtaining and accepting his resignation from the Government service. 

            22. Retention of lien/quasi-permanent status: - 

            No lien/quasi-permanent status of the Government servant concerned will to retained in his parent cadre. All his connections with the Government will be severed on his release for appointment in an enterprise and he will not be allowed to revert to his parent cadre. 

            23. Pay fixation:- 

            A Government servant selected for a post in a Central Public Enterprise will be free to negotiate his emoluments with the enterprise. On appointment to a post in a public sector enterprise on immediate absorption basis, a Government servant will be at par with other employees of the enterprise and will be governed by the rules of the enterprise in all respects. 

            24. Pension benefits: 

            i.  Resignation from Government service with a view to secure employment in a Central public enterprise with proper permission will not entail forfeiture of the service for the purpose of retirement/terminal benefits. In such cases, the Government servant concerned shall be deemed to have retired from service from the date of such resignation and shall be eligible to receive all retirement/terminal benefits as admissible under the relevant rules applicable to him in his parent organization. 

            ii.  The officer eligible for pension should exercise an option within 6 months of the date of his resignation for either of the following two alternatives:- 

            a.  Pro-rata monthly pension and death-cum-retirement gratuity admissible under the relevant rules. 

            b.  Pro-rata gratuity and a lump sum amount in lieu of pension worked out with reference to the commutation tables applicable on the date of resignation. 

            NOTE: Where no option is exercised within the prescribed time limit, the officer will be governed by alternative (a) above. Option once exercised shall be treated as final. 
              iii)  Any further liberalization of pension rules decided upon by Government after the date of resignation of a Central Government servant to join the public enterprise will not be extended to him. 

              iv) A Government servant who opts for pro-rata monthly pension on his resignation from Government service will not be entitled to relief on pension during his service in the public enterprise. 

              25. Leave: 

              A Government servant taking up an appointment in a Central public enterprise will be entitled to encashment of earned leave to his credit at the time of acceptance of his resignation from Government service, subject to a limit of 180 days. Half pay leave will stand forfeited. 
                26. Family pension: 

                If there is no family pension scheme in a public enterprise, or if the officer does not become eligible to join family pension scheme in the enterprise, the family pension as admissible under the Central Government will be allowed to him. 

                26.2. For the purpose of these instructions immediate absorption means acceptance of resignation of an officer from Government service to enable him to take up an appointment in a Central public enterprise, for which he had applied with proper permission. 

                26.3. Since the terminal benefits mentioned above are admissible only to those officers who leave Government service to secure employment in the enterprise, with proper permission, a case of grant of these benefits may be processed only after ascertaining from the enterprise concerned that the officer has actually joined them. 

                26.4. The stipulation of 'immediate absorption' will apply to all appointments of Central Government servants in the Central public enterprises, irrespective of the level of appointment, the mode of recruitment, and whether an appointment is in public interest or otherwise, but subject to the exceptions made in the OM dated 6.3.1985 referred to above. 

                26.5. For the purpose of these orders, a Central public enterprise is an undertaking wholly or substantially owned by the Government of India, and which is accepted as such by the bureau of Public Enterprises. 

                26.6. The terminal benefits etc. enumerated in para 1 above will be admissible to all Central Government servants, who secure appointments in Central public enterprises with proper permission. A Government servant selected for appointment in an enterprise on the basis of an application submitted by him before joining the Government service will be deemed to have applied with proper permission for the purpose of these orders. 

                26.7. All existing instructions on the subject will stand amended/ superseded to the extent indicated in the preceding paragraphs. Formal amendments in the statutory rules, where considered necessary, will be carried out in due course. 

                26.8. All cases of grant of pensionary benefits etc. to Government servants, who are appointed in the Central public sector enterprises on immediate absorption basis, shall be decided by the administrative Ministries/Cadre Controlling Authorities/Authorities competent to accept resignation of a Government servant in accordance with provisions of this OM All other cases not covered under the provisions of this OM or which require relaxation of any provision should continue to be referred to the Bureau of Public Enterprises with necessary service particulars. Cases of doubtful nature also should continue to be referred to the Bureau of Public Enterprises. 

                ** ** * * * * * 
                [http://documents.doptcirculars.nic.in/D2/D02est/Lien%20DraftKdaDv.PDF]

                सरकारी नौकरियों में प्रमोशन में आरक्षण : संविधान पीठ ने सुनवाई पूरी की, फैसला सुरक्षित

                $
                0
                0
                सरकारी नौकरियों में प्रमोशन में आरक्षण : संविधान पीठ ने सुनवाई पूरी की, फैसला सुरक्षित

                सुप्रीम कोर्ट की संविधान पीठ को तय करना है कि 12 साल पुराने आदेश पर फिर से विचार करने की जरूरत है या नहीं
                supreme-court-reservation-in-promotion-hindi-news

                नई दिल्ली: सरकारी नौकरियों में प्रमोशन में आरक्षण मामले में सुप्रीम कोर्ट की संविधान पीठ ने सुनवाई पूरी कर फैसला सुरक्षित रखा है. मुख्य न्यायाधीश दीपक मिश्रा, जस्टिस कुरियन जोसेफ, जस्टिस रोहिंटन नरीमन, जस्टिस संजय किशन कौल और जस्टिस इंदु मल्होत्रा ​​की संविधान पीठ के समक्ष इस तरह के कोटा के खिलाफ 2006 के नागराज फैसले पर पुनर्विचार की मांग करने वाली याचिकाओं पर सुनवाई पूरी हो गई.
                [post_ads]
                संविधान पीठ को यह तय करना है कि 12 साल पुराने आदेश पर फिर से विचार करने की जरूरत है या नहीं. केंद्र और राज्य सरकारों ने जहां सरकारी नौकरी में प्रमोशन में आरक्षण की वकालत की है, वहीं याचिकाकर्ताओं ने इसका विरोध किया है. केंद्र ने कहा है कि संविधान में SC/ST को पिछड़ा ही माना गया है.

                गौरतलब है कि अक्टूबर 2006 में नागराज बनाम भारत संघ के मामले में पांच जजों की संविधान पीठ ने इस मुद्दे पर निष्कर्ष निकाला कि राज्य नौकरी में पदोन्नति के मामले में अनुसूचित जाति/अनुसूचित जनजाति के लिए आरक्षण करने के लिए बाध्य नहीं है. हालांकि अगर वे अपने विवेकाधिकार का प्रयोग करना चाहते हैं और इस तरह का प्रावधान करना चाहते हैं तो राज्य को वर्ग के पिछड़ेपन और सार्वजनिक रोजगार में उस वर्ग के प्रतिनिधित्व की अपर्याप्तता दिखाने वाला मात्रात्मक डेटा एकत्र करना होगा.

                Read at: NDTV

                7th CPC Risk and Hardship Allowance to Mate, Keyman & Patrolman, P. Way Artisans and Gatekeepers: Railway Board Order

                $
                0
                0
                7th CPC Risk and Hardship Allowance to Mate, Keyman & Patrolman, P. Way Artisans including their Helpers and Gatekeepers at Spl. and A – Class Level: Railway Board Order

                GOVERNMENT OF INDIA 
                MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS 
                (RAILWAY BOARD) 

                F.No. PC-VII/2018/I/7/5/2 
                New Delhi, dated: 28.08.2018 

                OFFICE MEMORANDUM 

                Sub – Risk and Hardship Allowance to Mate, Keyman & Patrolman, Extension of Rich and Hardship Allowance to P. Way Artisans including their Helpers and Enhanced Allowance to Gatekeepers at Spl. and A – Class Level Crossing. 

                The undersigned is directed to refer to Ministry of Finance’s Resolution No.11- 1/2016-IC dated 06.07.2017 communicating the decision of Govt.of India w.r.t. recommendations of 7th CPC on allowances to state that the recommendations of 7th CPC to grant Risk and Hardship allowance at the rate 2700/- p.m. under Cell R3H2 of Risk and Hardship Matrix to Track Maintainers category of Indian Railways has been implemented in this Ministry through order No. PC-VII/2017/I/7/5/4 dated 10.08.2017 (Annexure – I). 

                2, Now, it has been proposed with the approval, of Railway Board that the following, changes in Lilo Risk and Hardship Allowance may be, introduced in respect of various categories of Indian Railways-
                • Increase Risk and Hardship allowance from Rs.2700/- per mouth (R3H2 categorization) to 6000/- (R2H2) for Mate and Keymen. 
                • Increase Risk and Hardship allowance from 2700/-p.m, (R3H2) to 4100/- (R3H1) for Trackmen preforming Patrolling duty. 
                • Increase in Level Crossing Gate Allowance from Rs,.1000/- (R3H3) to 4100/- (R3H1) for Gateman, working in Special & ‘A’ Class Gates. 
                • Include all P.Way Artisans & their helper also in the R&H Matrix for payment @2700/-(R3H2) as for Trackmen. 
                2. The assessed additional financial implications of those proposals at Para No. 2 above are approximately Rs.222 crores per annum. The detailed position w.r.t each of these proposals mentioned above are enclosed as Annexure II, Detailed calculation of the additional annual financial implications of the aforementioned proposals is placed at Annexure – III. 

                3. It is required that MoF may kindly consider for approval of Para 2(a,b,c & d). 

                (S. Balachandra Iyer) 
                Executive Director, Pay Commission – II 
                Railway Board 


                Viewing all 11682 articles
                Browse latest View live


                <script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>